John,
as said, the force_socket impacts *only* the contacts with *no socket
info* (see my prev post).
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
On 05/10/2017 09:28 PM, John Quick wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I tried the force_socket parameter in nathelper, but it did not work. The SIP
Pings continue to come from the address stored in the socket field of the
contact. Force_socket is ignored and has no impact at all.
I also tried the parameter natping_socket, but this breaks OpenSIPS and
prevents it starting. The log file shows this:
2017-05-10 18:05:46 ERROR:nathelper:init_raw_socket: cannot create raw socket
2017-05-10 18:05:46 ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to initialize module nathelper
2017-05-10 18:05:46 ERROR:core:main: error while initializing modules
John Quick
Smartvox Limited
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 10 May 2017 11:07
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Using Contact replication and HA
Hi John,
What you did (with the "net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind") is a good workaround for
the problem.
Also, I investigated the original issue and here it is:
1) the replicated contact (on backup) is saved with NULL socket, as the
received one is not valid (there is no err log on this, but only a dbg log)
2) when pinging the contact via nathelper, as the socket is NULL, nathelper
is trying to get a socket, but simply using the first listener matching the
proto (UDP) and AF family (ipv4) as per destination
3) it looks like this first UDP listener is not compatible with the
destination (localhost or a private network??)
Have you tried to use force_socket:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/nathelper.html#idp5512752
(it take effect only if the contact has no socket assigned).
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
On 05/09/2017 05:54 PM, John Quick wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
I tried different scenarios and eventually ended up with the backup server
having a listen statement for the VIP address.
Normally you cannot start OpenSIPS (or any other application) binding to an IP
address that is not assigned on a local interface.
However, adding the line "net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1" to /etc/sysctl.conf I
was then able to start OpenSIPS with that listen statement in place.
The backup server also listens on its own static IP using the proto_bin mechanism so it
can receive and send replications while it is in "standby" mode.
That is the dilemma:
Replicated Contacts can only be useful if the backup server is able to take
over the same VIP that was used on the primary server.
If the backup server does not use the VIP when it takes over as "active", then
the replicated socket information in the location table will be wrong.
If OpenSIPS only starts on the backup server *after* that server has acquired
the VIP then it could not receive the replicated Contacts using proto_bin when
it was in standby mode.
John Quick
Smartvox Limited
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 May 2017 14:45
To: [email protected]; OpenSIPS users mailling list
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Using Contact replication and HA
Hi John,
So, in your setup, on the backup server, OpenSIPS is not listening on the VIP
address at all, right ?
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit May 2017 Amsterdam
http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2017Amsterdam.html
On 05/03/2017 04:46 PM, John Quick wrote:
Hello,
I am still working my way through some of the new features described
at last year's Summit conference while you are all hopefully enjoying
this year's Summit.
I'm playing with the Clusterer module. It is a great idea but I am
finding a few practical difficulties for contact replication in the USRLOC
module.
In my test rig, there are two almost identical OpenSIPS servers (A and B).
Contact replication is enabled between the two servers and each
server has its own local database.
Linux HA - Corosync and Pacemaker - is used to control a Virtual IP
(VIP) address resource. This allows UA's to register at the VIP
address. HA decides which server has the virtual address at any given
time, based on node availability. Currently, Server A is assigned the
VIP and processes all UA registrations.
Problem: The "socket" field in the location table contains the VIP
address on both server A and B, but only Server A is bound to that
address while both servers are up.
Unless I completely disable NAT Pings in the nathelper module, Server
B reports a lot of errors like this:
2017-05-03 14:15:51 CRITICAL:core:proto_udp_send: invalid
sendtoparameters#012one possible reason is the server is bound to
localhost and#012attempts to send to the net
2017-05-03 14:15:51 ERROR:nathelper:msg_send: send() for proto 1
failed
2017-05-03 14:15:51 ERROR:nathelper:nh_timer: sip msg_send failed!
Worse, if I also enable the "remove_on_timeout_bflag" option on
Server B, it removes the registration on *both* servers after a short
delay even though the UA is still available!
Initially, I encountered problems with the HA IP Resource (or VIP)
with respect to OpenSIPS not starting on server B because it was
trying to bind to an address that was not currently assigned to any
local interface. While it is possible to group the IP resource with
the OpenSIPS service resource to overcome this problem, that would
completely break USRLOC contact replication because the OpenSIPS
service on Server B would not be running as long as Server A is up. I
had to resort to an option in sysctl.conf that allows processes to
start even if they are trying to bind to a non-local address.
This makes me wonder what is the purpose of Usrloc Contact
replication? Is there some other scenario that could use it and not have these
problems?
I also wonder what difference does the db_mode setting in Usrloc make
when using contact replication.
John Quick
Smartvox Limited
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
