Hi Denis,
I can't really tell what the problem is from the information you've
provided (the traces aren't much help as the messages between nodes are
binary data). Can you provide some logs relevant to the clusterer
(including debug level) from around the time when the nodes first try to
establish the links ?
Regards,
Vlad Patrascu
OpenSIPS Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/30/2017 11:46 AM, Denis via Users wrote:
Hello!
Any information about the problem?
Thank you.
--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis
25.08.2017, 16:51, "Denis via Users" <[email protected]>:
Hello!
Back to 2.2.5 resolved the problem. I got replication of, for
example, dialog/profile
--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis
24.08.2017, 17:46, "Denis via Users" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hello!
I am developing VoIP architecture with two proxies and one LB.
Between these proxies i have a cluster, using corresponding module.
All instances (proxies and LB) are on the same server.
I started from 2.2 and there were no problems with the cluster.
Recently, I upgraded Opensips from 2.2. to 2.3.1 and have got such
situation
./opensipsctl.sh fifo clusterer_list
Cluster:: 1
Node:: 2 DB_ID=2 URL=bin:1.1.1.1:5041 Enabled=1
Link_state=Probe Next_hop=none Description=none
./opensipsproxyctl.sh fifo clusterer_list
Cluster:: 1
Node:: 1 DB_ID=1 URL=bin:1.1.1.1:5040 Enabled=1
Link_state=Up Next_hop=1 Description=none
tcpdump
10:33:47.101956 IP 1.1.1.1.40428 > 1.1.1.1.5040: Flags [P.], seq
3444481492:3444481525, ack 3259636718, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS
val 65425778 ecr 65424597], length 33
10:33:47.101984 IP 1.1.1.1.5040 > 1.1.1.1.40428: Flags [.], ack 33,
win 6146, options [nop,nop,TS val 65425778 ecr 65425778], length 0
10:33:51.725437 IP 1.1.1.1.40428 > 1.1.1.1.5040: Flags [P.], seq
33:66, ack 1, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65426934 ecr
65425778], length 33
10:33:51.725458 IP 1.1.1.1.5040 > 1.1.1.1.40428: Flags [.], ack 66,
win 6146, options [nop,nop,TS val 65426934 ecr 65426934], length 0
and
10:35:12.589476 IP 1.1.1.1.34850 > 1.1.1.1.5041: Flags [P.], seq
1471487774:1471487807, ack 2063326017, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS
val 65447150 ecr 65445995], length 33
10:35:12.589491 IP 1.1.1.1.5041 > 1.1.1.1.34850: Flags [.], ack 33,
win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65447150 ecr 65447150], length 0
10:35:17.158143 IP 1.1.1.1.34850 > 1.1.1.1.5041: Flags [P.], seq
33:66, ack 1, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65448292 ecr
65447150], length 33
10:35:17.158153 IP 1.1.1.1.5041 > 1.1.1.1.34850: Flags [.], ack 66,
win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65448292 ecr 65448292], length 0
As you can see node 1 cannot see node 2 (Link_state=Probe). The
question is why?
Thank you.
--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis
,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
