If you want to do topology hiding for Presence, then there is no other way to do it, rather than storing the actual topology info in the contact header :(.

Best regards,

Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Developer
www.opensips-solutions.com

On 09/28/2017 11:18 AM, Royee Tichauer via Users wrote:
I want topology hiding for SUBSCRIBEs. The 200 OK that is returned by our servers for the initial SUBSCRIBE reveals the full topology of our system. We are not using the opensips presence module.

Thanks,
Royee

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:08 AM Răzvan Crainea <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi, Royee!

    Do you need topology hiding for Presence? If not, simply avoid
    calling topology_hiding() for anything else but INVITEs.

    Best regards,

    Răzvan Crainea
    OpenSIPS Developer
    www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>

    On 09/28/2017 10:57 AM, Royee Tichauer via Users wrote:
    Thats that solves that then.

    Is there a way I can do topology hiding to only of the legs to
    work around this issue?

    Thanks,
    Royee




    On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:36 AM Liviu Chircu <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Quoted params in Contact header parameters are accepted,
        according to RFC 3261 § 25.1:

        contact-params     =  c-p-q / c-p-expires
                              / contact-extension
        contact-extension  =  generic-param
        generic-param  =  token [ EQUAL gen-value ]
        gen-value      =  token / host / quoted-string
        quoted-string  =  SWS DQUOTE *(qdtext / quoted-pair ) DQUOTE

        Liviu Chircu
        OpenSIPS Developer
        http://www.opensips-solutions.com

        On 28.09.2017 08:58, Royee Tichauer via Users wrote:
        Understood, thanks Razvaan.

        Another issue I'm having here with SUBSCRIBE handling is
        with topology hiding. When I use the topology hiding module
        an extra header parameter named 'thinfo' is added to the
        contact field as explained in the docs. The field parameter
        value contains parenthesis surrounding it. For example the
        contact header I got was:

        Contact:
        
<sip:52.70.236.51:51842;transport=tcp;thinfo=*"*dm1KMyPQIyIU9fUQFpcQ0AVUdEXFwdbHNjClRbTF9TAGlwdkwWCBgeFFwoM3BMCBphbfKX18CEpfRENWAGhpfApUU0ddVANo*"*>

        The SUBSCRIBE request is being routed to another server
        which uses Java's Jane library. This library attempts to
        parse the headers of the SIP message and throws an exception
        of this contact header. When I remove the parenthesis it
        does work. My question is whether parenthesis are allowed in
        contact field headers or not. It seems that either opensips
        should not add these or that Jane has a bug in  I tried to
        look in the RFC-3261 section 20.10
        <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-20.10> but
        didn't get a concrete answer.

        Here are the Java Jain implementation of trying to parse the
        header and receiving an exception, I also have a sample
        <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1qvsk1sLQdPb2MzZkNVQXFncGM> of
        this project in case it helps:

        String sWithParenthesis ="Contact:
        
<sip:52.70.236.51:51842;transport=tcp;thinfo=\"dm1KMyPQIyIU9fUQFpcQ0AVUdEXFwdbHNjClRbTF9TAGlwdkwWCBgeFFwoM3BMCBphbfKX18CEpfRENWAGhpfApUU0ddVANo\">"
        +"\n";
        HeaderParser h = ParserFactory.createParser(sWithParenthesis);
        SIPHeader header = h.parse();
        System.out.println(header.getName());
        System.out.println(header.getHeaderValue());

        And this is the exception I am getting:

        Exception in thread "main" java.text.ParseException: [C@6477463f
        Expecting  >>>><<< got >>>"<<<
        at gov.nist.core.LexerCore.match(LexerCore.java:284)
        at
        gov.nist.javax.sip.parser.AddressParser.nameAddr(AddressParser.java:63)
        at
        gov.nist.javax.sip.parser.AddressParser.address(AddressParser.java:112)
        at
        
gov.nist.javax.sip.parser.AddressParametersParser.parse(AddressParametersParser.java:55)
        at
        gov.nist.javax.sip.parser.ContactParser.parse(ContactParser.java:69)
        at com.vonage.Main.main(Main.java:14)
        …

        On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 7:31 PM Răzvan Crainea
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hi, Royee!

            There's no need for an actual dialog (from OpenSIPS pov)
            - you can simply route the NOTIFY messages as
            sequentials - route them according to the Record-Route
            headers.

            Best regards,

            Răzvan Crainea
            OpenSIPS Developer
            www.opensips-solutions.com
            <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>

            On 09/25/2017 07:06 PM, Royee Tichauer via Users wrote:
            Hi,

            I am using opensips 2.1 as a SIP proxy and I am trying
            to figure out how to best handle SUBSCRIBE messages
            which need to be routed through to another SIP
            component. As I read in the rfc3265
            <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3265#ref-1> an initial
            (out of call) SUBSCRIBE creates a dialog which NOTIFYs
            and following SUBSCRIBE messages are part of and are
            routed within the same dialog.

            From looking at the opensips code I see that when
            "create_dialog" is called then the request is only
            handled if it is an INVITE request. So I'm trying to
            understand what is the proper way of handling the
            SUBSCRIBEs that come from the devices and the NOTIFYs
            that come from the PBX after the SUBSCRIBE is accepted.

            If there are examples for handling such SUBSCRIBEs that
            would be great.

            Thanks,
            Royee




            _______________________________________________
            Users mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

            _______________________________________________
            Users mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



        _______________________________________________
        Users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

        _______________________________________________
        Users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to