Hi Bogdan,

Thank you for your reply.
Unlike kamailio, Opensips has timer value in seconds which is enough for
the reply back. Just recalled the tm timer values for opensips.
I didn't test it with Opensips but i think you are right.

Since origin of both projects is same and the sample config was identical,
I thought it should applicable to opensips as well.
As soon as i will have time i will give a try to msilo with opensips.

Thank your for correction.


--
regards,

abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445

On 13 April 2018 at 18:19, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org> wrote:

> Hi Abdul,
>
> Not sure if this is applicable for us. According to the script sample, the
> fr_timer (in seconds) is 10....Is this value too low for a server to
> properly reply back ??
>
> I guess that bug is Kamailio specific. We are on the safe side ;)
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>   http://www.opensips-solutions.com
> OpenSIPS Summit 2018
>   http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam
>
> On 04/13/2018 12:42 AM, Abdul Basit wrote:
>
> Hi Opensips team,
>
> I faced instant message timeout issues with MSILO module while setting SIP
> IM server using kamailio.
> It turned out that fr_timer values was too low to wait for MESSAGE
> delivery to the destination (online/offline both cases) that server was
> replying with 408.
> Which result in message sending failed on sending side where as IM was
> reaching to the destination.
>
> The same issue is true for msilo sample configuration
> <http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/msilo.html#idp5682352>
> for opensips.
> Kindly update it at your end as well. This will save lot of time for the
> ones who want to use opensips as IM server.
>
> --
> regards,
>
> abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Abdul Basit <basit.e...@gmail.com>
> Date: 13 April 2018 at 02:28
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] MSILO: SIP stored offline MESSAGE repetitive
> delivery
> To: Henning Westerholt <h...@kamailio.org>
>
>
> Thanks Henning.
>
> Good move. You removed the timers so that they use their default values :)
>
> Same need to be done in sample msilo script
> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/msilo.html#idp45433660
>
> Who will be doing that?
>
>
> --
> regards,
>
> abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 00:37, Henning Westerholt <h...@kamailio.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 12 April 2018 10:15:19 CEST Abdul Basit wrote:
>> > My issue for IM handling has been resolved.
>> >
>> > @MS helped to look into the matter. From to the example
>> > [..]
>> >
>> > I replaced it as below
>> >
>> > # -- tm params --
>> >
>> > modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 10000 )
>> > modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 15 )
>> > modparam("tm", "wt_timer", 10 )
>> >
>> >
>> > Lower fr_timer was initiating 408 without waiting for 200 OK from
>> > destination because 10ms is too low. This was confusing msilo module and
>> > the sender device that MESSAGE sent was failed.
>> > Increasing the fr_timer value resolved the issue.
>> > This also resolved a ripple effect. i.e, kamailio delivery of offline
>> > messages from DB store to the destination party.
>> > Since kamailio was get message delivery error, it was
>> > executing failure_route[1] that was storing the message again in DB
>> store
>> > as offline message and so on.
>> >
>> > lower fr_timer values are also exits in 3.x, 4.x, 5x and dev branches
>> > documentation.
>> > [..]
>>
>> Hello Abdul,
>>
>> great that you found the issue. I have fixed this issue in git master and
>> also
>> 5.1 and 5.0 branch.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Henning
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing 
> listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to