On 16 Oct 2018, at 16:55, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > BTW, the missed and failed concepts were also in 1.11, with the same behavior > as in 2.4
It seems I missed the failed flag when I skimmed the 1.11 docs to see the difference. However I checked my old configurations and the behavior is not the same between 1.11 and 2.4. In 1.11 I used to set the accounting flag, the failed flag and the missed flag at the same time, but I would only get 1 negative reply being logged if the call failed. In 2.4 I get it twice (once from missed and once from failed) unless is a call with an intermediary failure (like 1 branch says 486 busy and the other says 200 ok) in which case I get it once (from missed) and also get the 200 ok. BTW, some failure codes are skipped even when missed is defined, like for example 482 loop detected. are they handled differently? > > http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/acc.html#idp5565104 > > http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.11.x/acc.html#idp5590880 > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Bootcamp 2018 > http://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_Bootcamp_2018/ > > On 10/16/2018 04:30 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: >> http://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-Advanced-Accounting >> >> Regards, >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer >> http://www.opensips-solutions.com >> OpenSIPS Bootcamp 2018 >> http://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_Bootcamp_2018/ >> >> On 10/16/2018 03:01 PM, Dan Pascu wrote: >>> What is the difference between the missed and failed flags for >>> do_accounting? They seem to overlap entirely for me (if I use both missed >>> and failed flags I get any code >= 300 reported twice). >>> >>> In version 1.11 there was only the missed flag that reported all response >>> codes >= 300, but now we have 2 and the documentation is not clear on their >>> difference. >>> >>> -- >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Dan _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
