Hi, this is the fallback to the next destination in my script:
failure_route[GW_FAILOVER] { if (t_was_cancelled()) { xlog("L_INF","*** Was cancelled \n"); exit; } # failure detection with redirect to next available trunk if (t_check_status("(408)|([56][0-9][0-9])")) { xlog("L_INF","Failed trunk $rd/$du->$avp(du_lb) detected \n"); if ( lb_next() ) { xlog("L_INF","Failed trunk detected, load balancer to next $rd/$du \n"); $avp(du_lb)=$du; t_on_failure("GW_FAILOVER"); t_relay(); exit; } send_reply("500","All GW are down"); xlog("L_INF","**** All GW are down \n "); } } Thank you very much Rocío El mar., 5 mar. 2019 a las 16:44, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu (<bog...@opensips.org>) escribió: > Hi Rocio, > > How do you script the fallback to the next destination ? I guess via > failure route, but could you post here the exact call of lb_next() ? also > how the initial LB triggering looks like ? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Summit 2019 > https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2019Amsterdam/ > > On 02/28/2019 09:16 AM, Rocio Walias wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I need a little help regarding a load balancer issue. > > I have two destinations (A.X.X.X and B.X.X.X) in the load balancer group. > A.X.X.X is working fine but sometimes B.X.X.X is not responding in time and > a 408 response is received. In that case I am doing a lb_next() and load > balancer send it to A.X.X.X but in “opensips fifo lb_list“ is showing that > B.X.X.X load is 1 and I think it must be 0 because in A.X.X.X load is 2 and > there is only 2 dialogs. > > > > Destination:: sip:33@A.X.X.X:5080 id=96 group=1 enabled=yes > auto-reenable=on > > Resources:: > > Resource:: channel max=10 *load*=2 > > Destination:: sip:33@B.X.X.X:5080 id=98 group=1 enabled=yes > auto-reenable=on > > Resources:: > > Resource:: channel max=10 *load=*1 > > > > I’m trying to remove that “load=1” but if I use lb_count_call to undo : > > if (lb_is_destination(“B.X.X.X", "5080", "1","1")) > > { > > lb_count_call("B.X.X.X","5080","1","channel","1"); > > } > > > > This error happens: > > Feb 21 13:05:18 [11033] ERROR:load_balancer:lb_route: sequential call of > LB - failed to remove from profile [lbXchannel]->[62] > > > > Is there any way to decrease the load of B.X.X.X or how can it not be > considered in load count in a failure_route? I’m saving load data to > statistics purpose and it doesn’t match with the number of dialogues. > > I’m using Opensips 2.4.2 > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing > listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users