Thank you . I had never encountered this issue earlier . Thank you . I am good to go without "m" flag . I will try to build our product to strictly follow this Allow header rules according to RFC .
Thank you for the information . *Thanks & Regards* *Sasmita Panda* *Senior Network Testing and Software Engineer* *3CLogic , ph:07827611765* On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:18 PM Liviu Chircu <li...@opensips.org> wrote: > Exactly! If we strictly obey RFC 3261, Sasmita's UA is basically saying: > "I do not support INVITE, do not bother sending such requests to me". > Most likely, > it does support it, but it poorly builds the "Allow" header. > > The above info on the "m" flag is also available in the save() flags > docs [1]. > > [1]: https://opensips.org/html/docs/modules/3.0.x/registrar.html#func_save > > Liviu Chircu > OpenSIPS Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 02.08.2019 14:21, Johan De Clercq wrote: > > It filters on methods. Liviu, correct me if I am wrong :-) > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users