Can we see your cfg ? On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 16:44, Mickael Hubert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your help David, > I'm already in debug level: > log_level=4 > > UAC is not in location table, because it's IP2IP connection (without > registration) > > I did another test: > I try to activate "Pp" in dialog creation to send OPTIONS to both sides > (leg A and B) > SIP client (tcp:192.168.10.203) -- my NAT router --> (tcp:2.2.2.2:8060) > opensips (udp:10.1.15.126:5060) --> rest of infra (udp:10.1.15.0/24:5060) > > OPTIONS from private interface is sent, but OPTIONS from public interface > can't be sent to natted UAC: > > Dec 16 16:52:22 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[2705]: > ERROR:tm:msg_send: send() to 192.168.10.203:5060 for proto tcp/2 failed > Dec 16 16:52:22 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[2705]: > ERROR:tm:t_uac: attempt to send to > 'sip:192.168.10.203;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;did=d9.ed83b676' failed > Dec 16 16:52:43 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[2693]: > ERROR:tm:msg_send: send() to 192.168.10.203:5060 for proto tcp/2 failed > Dec 16 16:52:43 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[2693]: > ERROR:tm:t_uac: attempt to send to > 'sip:192.168.10.203;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;did=d9.ed83b676' failed > > My other test (into VPN) works like a charm, but UAC is registered ! > > Is there a way to keep natted source ip and port to reuse them with > initial request from UAS ? > I use topology_hiding function, and it's not compatible with record_route. > But I tested to deactive TH and active RR, it's exactly the same issue, the > Re-INVITE from UAS is not forwarded to UAC. > > thanks > > Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 15:52, David Villasmil < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> please increase the debug level and paste the log. Also, check what is >> saved as the location for the user. >> >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 14:48, Mickael Hubert <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Maybe I founded: >>> I tested a call through Internet connection and I can see (uac natted): >>> >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:proto_tcp_send: *no open tcp connection found*, opening new >>> one, async = 1 >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:probe_max_sock_buff: getsockopt: snd is initially 16384 >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> INFO:core:probe_max_sock_buff: using snd buffer of 416 kb >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> INFO:core:init_sock_keepalive: TCP keepalive enabled on socket 11 >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:tcpconn_async_connect: Polling is overdue >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:tcpconn_async_connect: Create connection for async connect >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:print_ip: tcpconn_new: new tcp connection to: 192.168.10.203 >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:tcpconn_new: on port 5060, proto 2 >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:proto_tcp_send: Successfully connected from interface >>> 192.168.10.203:5060 to 192.168.10.203:56899! >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:proto_tcp_send: Successfully started async connection >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:tm:insert_timer_unsafe: [0]: 0x7efe91196790 (99) >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:tm:t_relay_to: new transaction fwd'ed >>> Dec 16 15:15:44 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> retcode = 1 >>> >>> The re-invite is never forwarded (no trace with sngrep, or classic >>> tcpdump) >>> I don't know why opensips wants use private IP and not natted IP... So... >>> >>> I tested through VPN connection (uac natted): >>> >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:tcp_conn_get: *tcp connection found* (0x7efe9118cf48), >>> acquiring fd >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:tcp_conn_get: c= 0x7efe9118cf48, n=16, Usock=168 >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31187]: >>> DBG:core:handle_worker: read response= 7efe9118cf48, 1, fd -1 from 35 >>> (31165) >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:tcp_conn_get: after receive_fd: c= 0x7efe9118cf48 n=8 fd=11 >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:proto_tcp_send: sending via fd 11... >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:async_tsend_stream: Async successful write from first try on >>> 0x7efe9118cf48 >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:core:proto_tcp_send: after write: c= 0x7efe9118cf48 n/len=1014/1014 >>> fd=11 >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:tm:insert_timer_unsafe: [0]: 0x7efe91196790 (1403) >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> DBG:tm:t_relay_to: new transaction fwd'ed >>> Dec 16 15:37:28 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[31165]: >>> retcode = 1 >>> >>> The re-inivte is forwarded correctly ! >>> >>> I pretty sure I use the keepalived mecasim .... >>> >>> >>> Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 14:27, Mickael Hubert <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> Yes I use it >>>> >>>> if (nat_uac_test("3") && ($Ri == $var(publicip) || $Ri == $var(vpnip))) >>>> { >>>> xlog("L_INFO","$avp(startlog) -- Nated EP Detected\n"); >>>> if (force_rport()) >>>> { >>>> xlog("L_INFO","$avp(startlog) -- RPORT parameter forced\n"); >>>> } >>>> if (fix_nated_contact()) >>>> { >>>> xlog("L_INFO","$avp(startlog) -- Nated $rm's Contact Fixed !\n"); >>>> } >>>> if (fix_nated_sdp("10")) >>>> { >>>> xlog("L_INFO","$avp(startlog) -- Nated SDP Fixed for $rm\n"); >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 13:50, David Villasmil < >>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Aré you using nathelper? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 12:06, Mickael Hubert <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> I advanced in my LAB >>>>>> I have this configuration: >>>>>> SIP client (tcp:192.168.10.203) -- my NAT router --> (tcp: >>>>>> 2.2.2.2:8060) opensips (udp:10.1.15.126:5060) --> rest of infra (udp: >>>>>> 10.1.15.0/24:5060) >>>>>> >>>>>> When I received the reinvite from "rest of infra" on private >>>>>> interface (10.1.15.126), I could see this log: >>>>>> >>>>>> Dec 16 12:55:27 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[26160]: >>>>>> ERROR:tm:msg_send: send() to 192.168.10.203:5060 for proto tcp/2 >>>>>> failed >>>>>> Dec 16 12:55:27 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[26160]: >>>>>> ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: sending request failed >>>>>> Dec 16 12:55:27 am-frontal1a-test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[26160]: >>>>>> retcode = -6 >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know why OpenSIPS tries to send the Re-invite to client >>>>>> private IP instead client public port and IP (natted). >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have an idea please ? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeu. 12 déc. 2019 à 11:09, Mickael Hubert <[email protected]> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> I have an issue, opensips doesn't want forward Re-INVITE during UDP >>>>>>> to TCP mapping session. >>>>>>> Customer (NATTED) -- TCP --> (public interface listen tcp:8060) >>>>>>> OpenSIPS (private interface listen udp:5060) --> rest of infrastructure >>>>>>> (udp:5060) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can send a call from customer to OpenSIPS (initial INVITE, 200OK, >>>>>>> etc ...). >>>>>>> But when I received Re-INVITE from UAS (sip session timer), OpenSIPS >>>>>>> doesn't forward it to customer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can see the call flow here: >>>>>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/eUSb5MvBhUfueaoM7 >>>>>>> You can see SIP messages and opensips's logs in txt file in >>>>>>> attachment >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OpenSIPS handles on it's public interface: >>>>>>> - Topology hiding >>>>>>> - Nat detection >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks a lot for you help ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> David Villasmil >>>>> email: [email protected] >>>>> phone: +34669448337 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> David Villasmil >> email: [email protected] >> phone: +34669448337 >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > -- Regards, David Villasmil email: [email protected] phone: +34669448337
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
