Hey Oleg,
What SIP features/capabilities do you want to have on the AS component?
IMHO this is the point to start - based on your own requirements on what
the AS must do, you can do a proper selection.
And yes, as Tito said, seas is dead fish in the water for a long time.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 4/14/20 4:29 PM, Oleg Podguyko via Users wrote:
Hi Bogdan and all your team!
We have been working with opensips for quite some time and we like it.
We keep the load on the order of 300-400 CAPS, and for example, the
SIP-I module is perhaps the only solution that allows you to fully
work with ISUP. Our programmers prepared several PRs based on the
results of work with SIP-I and SCTP modules.
We are faced with the task of creating a classic bundle of cscf + AS
server, in the future architecture opensips will play the role of
cscf, and as AS we look at the module SEAS + external server.
We are all moving towards IMS.
What do you think, how justified can such a choice be? Perhaps the
opensips team already has its own new vision for this?
What would you choose as AS?
--
Oleg Podguyko
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
