On 09.06.2020 15:43, Saint Michael wrote:
I talked to Vlad, who I believe wrote the code, and he does not think
it is a bug and I should use the ms and not the seconds. But thousands
of businessmen will not spot this and thus their billing will never
match the carrier, and they will lose money. If anybody thinks for a
second that a call with a 200 OK will be free, is dreaming. Not in
America.
Hi, SM!
Opinion #1: I doubt that anyone who is serious about their billing &
revenue (e.g. your nitpicky carrier) would leave to randomness the
answer to the most basic question of: "does our platform correctly bill
each call?". No disrespect here, just maybe highlighting the fact that
your platform could benefit from a bit more testing.
Opinion #2: we could definitely change the default of the
second-accurate precision to be _greedy_ instead of _generous_. I bet
most people (myself included) would be more happy with a ceil() [1]
behavior instead of a trunc() [2] one. That is: round _upwards_, not
_downwards_. More opinions would be useful here!
Best regards,
[1]: man ceil
[2]: man trunc
--
Liviu Chircu
www.twitter.com/liviuchircu | www.opensips-solutions.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
