Liviu, It looks like the fixed/update contact is lost only when topology_hiding() is involved. Would you prefer a separate issue, or shall I append the issue you referenced before?
- Jeff On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:15 PM Jeff Pyle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Liviu, > > fix_nated_contact() before topology_hiding(). Got it. As far as losing > the fixed contact during a serial fork, I'll do more testing to localize > exactly which combination of circumstances causes this to surface and open > a bug report. > > > - Jeff > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:28 PM Liviu Chircu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> On 28.10.2020 18:49, Jeff Pyle wrote: >> >> First, I lose the updated Contact from fix_nated_contact() after a >> serial fork. Is this expected? >> >> I would assume the `fix_nated_contact()` lump changes get backed up into >> shared memory, then made available during the failure_route. Anything else >> and IMHO it looks like a bug. Opinions welcome. >> >> >> Second, I've determined that if the Contact URI is not wrapped in <>, >> that's when I get the "second attempt to change URI Contact" error when >> running fix_nated_contact() in the branch_route[]. This feels like a >> bug. >> >> This one is a known, documented issue. Long story short: you should >> always call fix_nated_contact() _before_ topology_hiding(). See this truth >> table for more info [1]. >> >> [1]: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/2172 >> >> -- >> Liviu Chircuwww.twitter.com/liviuchircu | www.opensips-solutions.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
