No, I think that was the only place. Thank you! Ben Newlin
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> Date: Friday, November 19, 2021 at 2:39 AM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <[email protected]>, Ben Newlin <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1 Hi Ben, Fixes what I found on this matter, see [1]. Do you see any of these leftovers left in the current doc ? [1] https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/394ba080486f97f44afaf794fa82aba1f630b186<https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/394ba080486f97f44afaf794fa82aba1f630b186> Thanks and regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com<https://www.opensips-solutions.com> OpenSIPS eBootcamp 2021 https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021/<https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2021> On 11/18/21 4:04 PM, Ben Newlin wrote: While you are in the drouting module docs, there are multiple places in there where the changes from flags to sort_alg were not documented, especially for dr_carriers routing. Ben Newlin From: Users <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Liviu Chircu <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Date: Thursday, November 18, 2021 at 5:14 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Drouting /timerec documentation for 3.2 vs 3.1 On 18.11.2021 12:09, Pete Kelly wrote: > It looks like there are quite a few inconsistencies on the drouting > documentation page versus the docs here > https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec<https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec> > <https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec<https://opensips.org/docs/modules/3.2.x/cfgutils.html#func_check_time_rec>> > - so maybe just a link or reference to check_time_rec would work for > consistency? Most likely, any timerec-related info on that page is outdated. Will double-check all the content when I get to this task. I like the idea to link to check_time_rec(), as it will future-proof the drouting docs against changes to the core, common function. -- Liviu Chircu www.twitter.com/liviuchircu<http://www.twitter.com/liviuchircu> | www.opensips-solutions.com<http://www.opensips-solutions.com> OpenSIPS eBootcamp 2021: www.opensips.org/training<http://www.opensips.org/training> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
