Also thanks to Ovidiu for the helpful suggestion. I will remember that one :)
Mark. On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 11:50, Mark Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Bogdan > > It's no secret really, I was just speaking generically. > They are the MS Direct Routing domains, EG sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com > > Mark. > > > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 12:50, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> You say the DNS is publishing only one IP for the domain, but one may >> change ? If you want, you can PM me the actual domain to see how the DNS >> records looks like. >> >> Regards, >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer >> https://www.opensips-solutions.com >> OpenSIPS eBootcamp >> https://www.opensips.org/Training/Bootcamp >> >> On 2/22/22 12:31 PM, Mark Farmer wrote: >> >> Hi Bogdan >> >> The GW's have 2 CNAME records which I have no control over. DR has >> entries like subdomain.example.com:5061 >> I suspect the issue arises when the CNAMES swap around resulting in a >> mismatch. >> >> Currently I am using this to identify the source of the message which is >> probably not the best in terms of security. >> >> $avp(fd) = "subdomain.example.com"; >> if($(ct.fields(uri){s.index, $avp(fd)}) != NULL) >> >> Perhaps there is a better way? >> >> Best regards >> Mark. >> >> >> >> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 08:56, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> If a gw is defined via FQDN, that will by DNS resolved (NAPTR, SRV, A >>> records) when DB data is (re)loaded by DR module, and used later for such >>> checks. All found IPs (from DNS) will be stored on the GW. >>> >>> How do you specify the GW address in DB and what kind of DNS records do >>> you have for it ? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >>> >>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer >>> https://www.opensips-solutions.com >>> OpenSIPS eBootcamp >>> https://www.opensips.org/Training/Bootcamp >>> >>> On 2/18/22 6:04 PM, Mark Farmer wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> I am using is_from_gw() to match against a group of gateways specified >>> by DNS names which resolve to multiple IP addresses but it seems to be >>> failing to match. >>> >>> Is this supported functionality or do I need to do something else in >>> this case? >>> >>> Thanks and regards >>> Mark. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing >>> [email protected]http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mark Farmer >> [email protected] >> >> >> > > -- > Mark Farmer > [email protected] > -- Mark Farmer [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
