Hi Babak,
Are you somehow doing any fix_nated_contact() for that 302 reply??
(maybe in the onreply_route)
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Bootcamp 5-16 Dec 2022, online
https://www.opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_eBootcamp_2022/
On 11/15/22 3:02 PM, Babak Yakhchali wrote:
Hi
I'm tryin to handle 302 redirect replies to opensips, In my failure
route I have this:
if (t_check_status("30[12]") && $(<reply>hdr(X-xferByCharger))== "true") {
xlog("failure_route: redirect by charger to
$(<reply>hdr(Contact))");
....
if (get_redirects(1,1)){
xlog("failure_route: after redirect ru:$ru and du:$du");
t_relay();
}
exit;
}
and the 302 msg is:
2022/11/15 15:29:25.253868 10.0.0.82:5060 <http://10.0.0.82:5060> ->
10.0.0.192:5060 <http://10.0.0.192:5060>
SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.192:5060;branch=z9hG4bK4897.63b48a64.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.18.120.236:49276;received=80.191.36.252;rport=49276;branch=z9hG4bK14771
Max-Forwards: 69
From: "" <sip:123...@my-domain.com
<mailto:sip%3a123...@my-domain.com>>;tag=5447
To: <sip:123456@ my-domain.com:5060
<http://my-domain.com:5060>>;tag=6Dyya5c1yvpQK
Call-ID: 21726
CSeq: 20 INVITE
*Contact: "unknown" <sip:123456@10.0.0.109
<mailto:sip%3A123456@10.0.0.109>>*
User-Agent:
FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.9.0+git~20190122T161705Z~5ac757ce54~64bit
Accept: application/sdp
Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE,
REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY
Supported: timer, path, replaces
Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, refer
Reason: Q.850;cause=31;text="NORMAL_UNSPECIFIED"
Content-Length: 0
and opensips logs:
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: resume branch=0
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: checking branch=0 (added=0)
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:uac_redirect:get_redirect: branch=0 is a redirect (added=0)
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff
*Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:uac_redirect:sort_contacts: sort_contacts:
<sip:123456@10.0.0.82:5060 <http://sip:123456@10.0.0.82:5060>> q=10*
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: 1 contacts remaining after filtering
and sorting
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:uac_redirect:shmcontact2dset: adding contact
<sip:123456@10.0.0.82:5060 <http://sip:123456@10.0.0.82:5060>>
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:core:pv_get_dsturi: no destination URI
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:tracer:is_id_traced: trace=on dyn=off
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:tracer:is_id_traced: trace=on dyn=off
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:tracer:sip_context_trace_impl: name hep_tid, hash 1710534437, type
0, traceable on
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:proto_hep:add_hep_chunk: Chunk with (id=17; vendor=0) not found!
Creating!
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:proto_hep:add_hep_chunk: Hep chunk with (id=17; vendor=0)
successfully built!
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
DBG:core:mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Nov 15 15:52:12 lta-opensips-stage /usr/sbin/opensips[40099]:
failure_route: after redirect *ru:sip:123456@10.0.0.82:5060
<http://ru:sip:123456@10.0.0.82:5060> and du:<null>*
Reading uac_redirect docs I expect that Contact header to be used as a
new destination but the original ru is used again!
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
