*Michael Ulitski* Ace Innovative Networks, Inc. Main/SMS: 212-868-2366 Direct/SMS: 212-812-1203 https://www.aceinnovative.com On 11/12/24 02:51, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Thanks Michael for the confirmation - this make me think that somehow you still have some differences between the cfg files on the 2 OpenSIPS instances, otherwise this fix would have no effect ;)Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 12.11.2024 00:20, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:It works now. Thanks a lot! *Michael Ulitskiy* Ace Innovative Networks, Inc. Main/SMS: 212-868-2366 Direct/SMS: 212-812-1203 https://www.aceinnovative.com On 11/11/24 04:43, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:Hi Michael,Liviu pushed on master a potential fix (see [1]). I still think there is some mismatch between the 2 scripts you have, nevertheless the replication should not be affected - and here is the fix Liviu did. Could you try with it and see if it solves your problem ?[1] https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/ee8b3a26f34ef4540b21691577423f545714fc7dBest regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 06.11.2024 17:58, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:Hi Bogdan,Attached is capture of traffic on port 5555. While it was running I restarted backup opensips running at 66.114.80.227 and waited for registration cycle of endpoint 'xyz011101'. Usrloc dump still shows that cflags are not replicated.Active server at 66.114.80.226: { "AOR": "xyz011101", "Contacts": [ { "Contact": "sip:xyz011101@192.168.0.190:1026", "ContactID": "3246532381380715253", "Expires": 50, "Q": "", "Callid": "bcab86e5a838513dd934c35ee9392a76", "Cseq": 8, "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446", "Received": "sip:66.114.80.8:1026", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "Cflags": "NAT_BFLAG", "Socket": "udp:66.114.80.228:5060", "Methods": 8063,"Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;nat=yes;"} ] } Backup server at 66.114.80.227: { "AOR": "xyz011101", "Contacts": [ { "Contact": "sip:xyz011101@192.168.0.190:1026", "ContactID": "3246532381380715253", "Expires": 48, "Q": "", "Callid": "bcab86e5a838513dd934c35ee9392a76", "Cseq": 8, "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446", "Received": "sip:66.114.80.8:1026", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "Cflags": "", "Socket": "udp:66.114.80.228:5060", "Methods": 8063,"Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;nat=yes;"} ] } Thanks, *Michael Ulitskiy* Ace Innovative Networks, Inc. Main/SMS: 212-868-2366 Direct/SMS: 212-812-1203 https://www.aceinnovative.com On 11/6/24 06:20, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:Hi Michael,Strange I would say. Could you get me a pcap capturing the BIN traffic (normally the 5555 tcp port) to see what exactly is replicated? Of course, please send it off-list :).Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 06.11.2024 01:38, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:Hello Bogdan,Config is very similar. Mostly things specific to local machine are different (ip address, hostname, etc). "NAT_BFLAG" is the only branch flag used. Registrar does 'save("domain")'.I worked around it by adding "nat=yes" to registrar's "attr_avp", which seems to be replicated just fine, but sure, it's better to have cflags replicated as they should.Thanks, Michael On 11/5/24 10:26, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:Hi Michael,Do you have identical cfg's on both servers? The replication of the contact-flags is definitely in place. But if you have different cfg's with different flags used, their mapping (string to idx) may differ on the 2 servers, so the set of idx's replicated by the first machine may have 0 meaning for the second one.Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer https://www.opensips-solutions.com https://www.siphub.com On 01.11.2024 00:16, Michael Ulitskiy wrote:Hello,To my surprise I've noticed that opensips location cluster (full-sharing,active/backup) doesn't replicate contacts cflags.Active server: { "AOR": "xyz011101", "Contacts": [ { "Contact": "sip:xyz011101@192.168.0.190:1026", "ContactID": "3246532381380717115", "Expires": 53, "Q": "", "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76", "Cseq": 88, "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446", "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "Cflags": "NAT_BFLAG", "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060", "Methods": 8063,"Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"} ] } Backup server: { "AOR": "xyz011101", "Contacts": [ { "Contact": "sip:xyz011101@192.168.0.190:1026", "ContactID": "3246532381380717115", "Expires": 46, "Q": "", "Callid": "5be2b61175573914d242ab6f79392a76", "Cseq": 88, "User-agent": "PolycomVVX-VVX_150-UA/5.9.2.3446", "Received": "sip:x.x.80.8:1026", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "Cflags": "", "Socket": "udp:x.x.80.228:5060", "Methods": 8063,"Attr": "company_id=2;station_family_id=2;station_id=394;"} ] }Looks like everything is replicated by cflags. Am I missing something? Is it an oversight?root@csptest-p1n1:~# /usr/local/opensips3/sbin/opensips -V version: opensips 3.4.9 (x86_64/linux)flags: STATS: On, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, HP_MALLOC, DBG_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAITADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535poll method support: poll, epoll, sigio_rt, select. git revision: cd02af8d9 main.c compiled on 14:36:42 Oct 31 2024 with gcc 5.5.0 Config: #### Clusterer Module loadmodule "clusterer.so" modparam("clusterer", "my_node_id", 1) modparam("clusterer", "db_mode", 0) modparam("clusterer", "sharing_tag", "status/1=active") modparam("clusterer", "seed_fallback_interval", 10)modparam("clusterer", "my_node_info", "cluster_id=1, url=bin:x.x.80.226:5555, flags=seed") modparam("clusterer", "neighbor_node_info", "cluster_id=1,node_id=2,url=bin:x.x.80.227:5555")#### USeR LOCation module loadmodule "usrloc.so"modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", "NAT_BFLAG") #NAT bflag saved in usrloc, used to indicate nat modparam("usrloc", "desc_time_order", 1) #location records are kept timestamp ordered. most recent 1stmodparam("usrloc", "cseq_delay", 10)modparam("usrloc", "hash_size", 14) #2^14 - 16356 hash entriesmodparam("usrloc", "location_cluster", 1) modparam("usrloc", "cluster_mode","full-sharing") modparam("usrloc", "working_mode_preset", "full-sharing-cluster") Any ideas? Thanks, -- *Michael Ulitskiy* Ace Innovative Networks, Inc. https://www.aceinnovative.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
