Hi Bogdan,

Sure, I see. Thanks for the feedback.

I also found that I can probably use the new tm variable
"$tm.branch.last_received[]" to solve my problem.
It was introduced in ver 3.6 and  I think it can help.

Thanks again and have a good weekend!
Stas




On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 8:31 AM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Stas,
>
> Hard to day :) ...indeed, it is not right, in the same time I see no easy
> "fix" here .... But we have have a ticket, to keep track of this. Worst
> case we document it :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>   https://www.siphub.com
>
> On 29.01.2026 18:09, Stas Kobzar wrote:
>
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> It seems so. I see in logs that "push_reply_in_dialog" is called after
> final reply 503 (see below).
>
> I guess this is a bug, no? Should I create an issue on github?
>
> Regards,
> Stas
>
> ====================================== dialog module logs
> ==========================================
> INFO:dialog:w_create_dialog: bye on timeout activated
> INFO:dialog:build_new_dlg: new dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88
> (c=7f27c7b0-944e-425a-b2a6-4542df5887b1,f=sip:[email protected],t=
> sip:[email protected],ft=gTMFDIbNOylaQcl9) on hash 4044
> INFO:dialog:update_leg_info: route_set , contact
> sip:[email protected]:36715;transport=udp, cseq 2147483548 and bind_addr
> udp:127.0.0.1:5060
> INFO:dialog:dlg_update_leg_info: set leg 0 for 0x7fbda2b9ec88:
> tag=<gTMFDIbNOylaQcl9> rcseq=<0>
> INFO:dialog:link_dlg: ref dlg 0x7fbda2b9ec88 with 3 -> 3 in h_entry
> 0x7fbda2b7bb20 - 4044
> INFO:dialog:dlg_onreq: t hash_index = 23522, t label = 352414250
> NOTICE:new branch at sip:[email protected]:5060
> INFO:dialog:dlg_update_contact: Using the same contact
> <sip:[email protected]:36715;transport=udp> for dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88 on
> leg 0
> INFO:dialog:dlg_onreq_out: pushing new leg 1/1
> INFO:dialog:pv_get_dlg_status: =============> pv_get_dlg_status:
> dlg->state = DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED
> NOTICE:=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=100, DLG_status=1
> INFO:dialog:pv_get_dlg_status: =============> pv_get_dlg_status:
> dlg->state = DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED
> NOTICE:=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=503, DLG_status=1
> NOTICE:ACC: call missed:
> timestamp=1769700287;created=0;setuptime=1769700287;method=INVITE;from_tag=gTMFDIbNOylaQcl9;to_tag=a3c41695-b5fc-4f28-bf31-1af33b6837b6;call_id=7f27c7b0-944e-425a-b2a6-4542df5887b1;code=503;reason=Failed
> foo
> INFO:dialog:push_reply_in_dialog: 0x7fbda2b9ec88 totag in rpl 503 is
> <a3c41695-b5fc-4f28-bf31-1af33b6837b6> (36)
> INFO:dialog:push_reply_in_dialog: new branch with tag
> <a3c41695-b5fc-4f28-bf31-1af33b6837b6>, leg_idx=1
> INFO:dialog:update_leg_info: route_set , contact , cseq 2147483548 and
> bind_addr udp:127.0.0.1:5060
> INFO:dialog:dlg_update_leg_info: set leg 1 for 0x7fbda2b9ec88:
> tag=<a3c41695-b5fc-4f28-bf31-1af33b6837b6> rcseq=<2147483548>
> INFO:dialog:next_state_dlg: ============> next_state_dlg: begin with
> state 'DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED' on event: 'DLG_EVENT_RPL3xx'
> INFO:dialog:next_state_dlg: ============> next_state_dlg: dialog
> 0x7fbda2b9ec88 changed from state 'DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED' to state
> 'DLG_STATE_DELETED', due event 'DLG_EVENT_RPL3xx'
> INFO:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88 changed from state 1 to
> state 5, due event 4
> INFO:dialog:dlg_onreply: dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88 failed (negative reply)
> INFO:dialog:pv_get_dlg_status: =============> pv_get_dlg_status:
> dlg->state = DLG_STATE_DELETED
> NOTICE:=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=180, DLG_status=5
> INFO:dialog:next_state_dlg: ============> next_state_dlg: begin with
> state 'DLG_STATE_DELETED' on event: 'DLG_EVENT_TDEL'
> INFO:dialog:next_state_dlg: ============> next_state_dlg: dialog
> 0x7fbda2b9ec88 changed from state 'DLG_STATE_DELETED' to state
> 'DLG_STATE_DELETED', due event 'DLG_EVENT_TDEL'
> INFO:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88 changed from state 5 to
> state 5, due event 1
> INFO:dialog:_unref_dlg: Destroying dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88 due to unref
> INFO:dialog:destroy_dlg: destroying dialog 0x7fbda2b9ec88
> INFO:dialog:destroy_dlg: dlg expired or not in list - dlg 0x7fbda2b9ec88
> [4044:2104306243] with clid '7f27c7b0-944e-425a-b2a6-4542df5887b1' and tags
> 'gTMFDIbNOylaQcl9' 'a3c41695-b5fc-4f28-bf31-1af33b6837b6'
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 10:56 AM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stas,
>>
>> I think the reply_route is triggered (by TM module) before running the TM
>> callbacks used by dialog module to do the status update :(
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>>
>> OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
>>   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
>>   https://www.siphub.com
>>
>> On 28.01.2026 22:23, Stas Kobzar wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Variable *$DLG_status* returns "1" in the response route after
>> provisional responses are received.
>> Here is extraction of the logs:
>> //-------------------------------------------------------------
>> NOTICE:=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=100, DLG_status=1
>> NOTICE:=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=180, DLG_status=1
>> NOTICE:=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=200, DLG_status=2
>> //-------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Reply route code with log:
>> //-------------------------------------------------------------
>> onreply_route[main_reply] {
>>     xlog("=====> incoming reply T_reply_code=$T_reply_code,
>> DLG_status=$DLG_status\n");
>> }
>> //-------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Doc says:
>> 1 - Dialog unconfirmed (created but no reply received at all)
>>
>> So, I expect to see "DLG_status=2" when first 100 response received
>> (Dialog in early state).
>>
>> The script is very simple and generated with "make menuconfig" (please,
>> see attached)
>>
>> I have tried with ver 3.4 and 3.6
>> My question: is it a bug or am I missing some configuration?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing 
>> [email protected]http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to