UPDATE: Figured out the problem. I've got entries in smtpd_recipient_restrictions which could allow a connection to completely bypass cluebringer.
This may be a stupid question, but is Cluebringer ever likely to be able to compensate for this? If it is possible, I would have thought that it would make sense to have cluebringer after checks like check_recipient_access etc? I'm no Postfix guru so I'm just guessing there. 2009/5/6 Guy <[email protected]>: > Thanks. > > I've tried that, but the quotas don't appear to be being applied at all. > Should there be a line with something like "cbpolicyd[processid]: > module=Quotas"? > > I've got a policy with source as a group with only one address in the > list and destination as any. I've set a quota on that policy with a > messagecount of 1, a period of 900 and tracking on sen...@domain. I'm > still able to send more than one email from that address. > > I've checked that quotas are enabled and I've enabled detailed > logging. I've noticed that I'm getting tracking errors for outbound > messages. > May 6 14:10:57 server amavis[8754]: (08754-08) [TRACKING] DEBUG: > Retreiving session data for triplet: > 09C2233012B/x.x.x.x/[email protected] > May 6 14:10:57 server amavis[8754]: (08754-08) (!!)[TRACKING] ERROR: > No session data > May 6 14:10:57 server amavis[8754]: (08754-08) > (!)policyd/process_policy: No session data found > > I'm running 2.0.6 stable with a couple of patches for tracking. > Have there been any recent patches that might be applicable to this? > Or have I possibly done a dumb somewhere? If there's anything I can do > to help narrow down what might be causing the problem just let me > know. > > Thanks > Guy > > 2009/5/3 Nigel Kukard <[email protected]>: >> >>> I want to be able to apply a permissive quota on some of our users and >>> a more restrictive quota on the rest. Quotas don't allow inheritance >>> like greylisting does so I'm wondering if there's a way to do this. >>> >>> At the moment I have a list of users in a group on a policy and a >>> permissive quota associated with them. I also have a quota setup on >>> the default outbound policy. If I put the permissive quota policy >>> before the default, the default will just be applied afterwards anyway >>> correct? And if I place the permissive quota policy after the default >>> the default quota will be applied first anyway? Does policyd apply the >>> quota after checking all matches or as it finds each one? >>> >> -It resolves the polices, then loops with them in order. If mail is >> blocked by quota 1 before it gets to quota 2, quota 2 will not be updated. >> >> Having said that I think you want to put your permissive quota first. >> >> Regards >> Nigel >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > > -- > Don't just do something...sit there! > -- Don't just do something...sit there! _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users
