> > Hi Nigel
> > 
> > I found another "bug" (not really a bug, more usability)
> > 
> > I recognized that after i imported my whitelist directly into the
> > database. Somehow there was an invalid entry in there. First thought
> > that can not happen when using the interface (because the address is
> > checked then), but it's also possible with the interface.
> > 
> > Adding an entry like "127.0/24" (or whatever, can also add "sdfsdf") the
> > mail processing stops with a "450 - Recipient address rejected" and
> > "Failed to parse address".
> > 
> > An invalid IP address should be skipped, and not make the check fail,
> > and should also be checked by the web interface.
> 
> Hi Urs,
> 
> Please try out the attached patch and let us know if it solves the problem.
> 
> - Robert

Hi Robert,

f.ex. "sdfsdfs" does not work.

For one of my OSS project i made a regex which matches an IP address:

^(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|1\d\d|\d?\d)(\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|1\d\d|\d?\d)){3}$

This exactly checks a valid IP address without any netmask (but can
easily be added) Maybe this helps for a better checking.

Urs
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to