Ah sorry. Replied to Nigel before I read your email. Postfix is reading from the same mysql cluster for authentication so it would probably be sensible to use cluebringer on the postfix boxes themselves. What sort of load/RAM usage will cluebringer add to my postfix boxes? The load averages on the boxes I'm replacing rarely goes above 2..
Thanks -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ulrik Haugen Sent: 04 March 2011 09:57 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [policyd-users] Highly Available Cluebringer Hello! "Ian Mordey" <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone got any information/experience with setting up cluebringer > in a highly available environment? Active/Passive or Active/Active is > fine by me. I don't have any experience of that in particular, just some plans for making my next setup behave better. > I was thinking about having two dedicated cluebringer servers > connected to the same DB server and using something like keepalived > and VRRP for a virtual IP that moves over to the second box in the event of > failure. > Will this be enough? I assume all the policies and quotas will be read > from the database and everything will just carry on as normal. Any particular reason not to just run a Cluebringer locally on each Postfix server? They can all query the same (clustered if you like) database. If you're going to set up many Postfix servers I take it you have some method for distributing configuration changes, so that shouldn't trip you up more than configuring the Postfixen. Best regards /Ulrik Haugen _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users
