On 05/14/2013 12:24 PM, Christian Rohmann wrote:
Hey cluebringers, nigel,On 07.10.2011 13:56, Nigel Kukard wrote:I am wondering, why you're not releasing the current code as a first release of policyd v2.1. I believe that not many (more) people jump at the git code and run it in production. A fist (beta) release would get more installations into using (i.e. testing) the code/functionality of 2.1. I'd also love to see more people testing IPv6 and get their feedback.Still a couple of things which we need to address with 2.1 :)Once again, thanks for keeping policyd alive and well. May I kindly ask again if you plan to release a 2.1 at some point. As said a year ago, with IPv6 really taking off you'll end up with people running all kinds of snapshots or git commits in production and then you'll never get any real feedback / bugreports on 2.1. A version 2.1.0 with a strong remark that it's a first release of a new major version, nobody can complain when they find bugs ....
There is still are few major changes that must be done before a version can be tagged other than snapshot.
The biggest thing is differentiation between a email message and the number of recipients its sent to, this requires a quotas change to the current specification.
Sponsorships have been slow, so development isn't as fast as I'd like it to be. We'd like to work on a bounty system at some stage in the future with a progress bar about how far we are away from another release.
-N
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.policyd.org
