On Monday, November 09, 2015 01:27:14 PM skee...@skeeved.org wrote: >On 11/09/2015 01:10 AM, Nigel Kukard via Users wrote: >> On Thursday, November 05, 2015 06:49:56 PM M B wrote: >> >> >What is the status of IPv6 support? I see there hasn’t been a release >> in over 2 years. Is there any active development? The most recent >> activity I saw in git was copyright update! >> >> >Can we continue to depend on policyd v2 moving forward into the IPv6 >> future? >> >> I believe that I made a post on the ML about this. >> >> You're more than welcome to sponsor the next version if you want it sooner. >> >There's your answer as to whether you can depend on policyd for (insert >your concern here). Sooner than what, I might ask.
Refer to https://servicedesk.iitsp.com/faq/6 . >With two years without any substantive progress and/or support to show >for it, I consider policyd dead. I have abosolutely no obligation whatsoever to provide you or anyone else with any kind of support, nor am I obligated in any way to maintain any number of public commits over any time frame. I do however take time away from my family and answer requests that I want to, when I want to and I will work on the project in my free time when I am in the mood to do so. You are not privy to any development currently happening or the number of hours spent on it, nor do you have access to the enterprise repository. Your consideration that the project is dead is based on your own personal assumption which has no factual merrit and is quite disrespectful. >It's a shame really because there's not much out there with the >(purported) feature set of policyd. Its a shame I have to waste my time answering mails like this. -N
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.policyd.org http://lists.policyd.org/mailman/listinfo/users_lists.policyd.org
