If ibrav=0, you must NOT specify celldm(2-6), according to the manual.
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/input-syntax/INPUT_PW.html#id3775702

More info can be found there in regarding celldm, ibrav, CELL_PARAMETTERS

PS: you should not change subject of your email. This would help to
keep your email in the same thread, and help others to understand well
your situation.
--------------------------------------------------
Duy Le
PhD Candidate
Department of Physics
University of Central Florida.

"Men don't need hand to do things"



On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:06 PM, dipak thakur <deepak.p.thakur at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Sir,
>
> Good evening.
>
> I think I was unable to convey my message correctly.
>
> Kindly go through the input file below.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ?&CONTROL
> ?????????????????????? title = Graphene mono layer ,
> ???????????????? calculation = 'relax' ,
> ??????????????? restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
> ????????????????????? outdir = '/root/tmp/' ,
> ????????????????? pseudo_dir = '/root/Desktop/QUANTUM_ESPRESSO/pseudo/' ,
> ????????????????????? prefix = graphene ,
> ???????????????????? disk_io = 'default' ,
> ?????????????????? verbosity = 'default' ,
> ?????????????? etot_conv_thr = 1.D-4 ,
> ?????????????? forc_conv_thr = 1.D-3 ,
> ?????????????????????? nstep = 50 ,
> ????????????????????????? dt = 40 ,
> ?/
> ?&SYSTEM
> ?????????????????????? ibrav = 0,
> ?????????????????? celldm(1) = 1.0000000,
> ??? ??? ? ? ? ? ?? celldm(2) = 1.0000000,
> ??? ??? ? ? ? ? ?? celldm(3) = 0.5000000,
> ???????????????????????? nat = 32,
> ??????????????????????? ntyp = 1,
> ???????????????????? ecutwfc = 50 ,
> ???????????????????? ecutrho = 400 ,
> ???????????????? occupations = 'smearing' ,
> ??????????????????? smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
> ?????????????????????? nspin = 1 ,
> ????????????????? lda_plus_u = .false. ,
> ?/
> ?&ELECTRONS
> ??????????? electron_maxstep = 300,
> ??????????????????? conv_thr = 1.0d-8 ,
> ???????????????? mixing_mode = 'plain' ,
> ???????????????? mixing_beta = 0.5 ,
> ???????????? diagonalization = 'cg' ,
> ??????????? diago_cg_maxiter = 50,
> ?/
> ?&IONS
> ?/
> CELL_PARAMETERS
> ??? 16.121319540??? 9.383047808??? 0.000000000
> ???? 0.000000000?? 18.658162370??? 0.000000000
> ???? 0.000000000??? 0.000000000?? 56.689342400
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> ??? C?? 12.01070? C.pbe-van_bm.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
> ??? C????? 2.891630000??? 7.402190000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 3.592920000??? 8.638320000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 3.603490000??? 6.167020000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.018600000??? 8.645010000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.021500000??? 6.165980000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.733020000??? 7.405220000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 1.471840000??? 7.396160000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 2.891120000??? 9.870660000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 2.894710000??? 4.932640000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.733190000??? 9.888500000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.736430000??? 4.941300000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.163480000??? 7.412030000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 1.474740000??? 4.926900000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 0.762281000??? 8.627830000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 0.763134000??? 6.161720000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 1.471500000??? 9.863350000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 3.603410000?? 11.109500000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.021240000?? 11.123900000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 3.605120000??? 3.701560000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.026450000??? 3.707890000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.878070000??? 8.655320000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.163730000??? 9.894970000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.162030000??? 4.948140000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.876190000??? 6.176770000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 5.736340000?? 12.352200000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 0.772689000??? 3.691020000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 0.762793000??? 1.220030000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.876450000?? 11.133700000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.162030000?? 12.358700000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 7.872010000?? 13.592200000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 2.894790000??? 2.466190000??? 2.000000000
> ??? C????? 1.474820000??? 2.458780000??? 2.000000000
> K_POINTS automatic
> ? 6 6 1?? 1 1 1
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I am desparately trying to understand how to determine:
> 1. The
> CELL_PARAMETERS
> ??? 16.121319540??? 9.383047808??? 0.000000000
> ???? 0.000000000?? 18.658162370??? 0.000000000
> ???? 0.000000000??? 0.000000000?? 56.689342400
> (or how are they determined in this case) - This is again a copy of earlier
> post.
> 2. The????????? celldm(1) = 1.0000000,
> ??? ??? ? ? ? ? ?? celldm(2) = 1.0000000,
> ??? ??? ? ? ? ? ?? celldm(3) = 0.5000000,
> ?????????????????? How do I fix them.
> Is there any software and/or technique to do this? or Is there any
> mathematical relation that would be able to provide me these values.
> The cell parameters are given to a precision upto 9th decimal place.
>
> Secondly, the celldm(3) =0.5, does it mean that it would divide the value
> 56.689342400 by 2 and can similar logic be applied to celldm(1) and
> celldm(2)?
> Thirdly, if I view the geometry in XcrySDen, it show vacuum layers in Z
> direction, but no gap/vacuum in x and y direction? I have seen this in many
> papers published till date and is trying to understand these things.
> Doesn't the adjacent supercell (in x and y direction) interact with the
> supercell under consideration?
> Also is there relation between the co-ordinates of the atom, the CELL
> PARAMETERS and celldm()?
>
> I hereby request you to kindly help me in this regard.
>
> Deepak Thakur
> Research Student
> Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University,
> Vishnupuri, Nanded,
> Maharashtra,
> India.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>

Reply via email to