How did you evaluate energy of a CO molecule?
--------------------------------------------------
Duy Le
PhD Student
Department of Physics
University of Central Florida.

"Men don't need hand to do things"



On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Janesko, Benjamin <b.janesko at tcu.edu> wrote:
>> On Jun 25, 2010, at 19:34 , Janesko, Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> > Everything looks reasonable in XCrysDen
>>
>> and what is the C-Au or O-Au distance? it seems to me that the CO
>> molecule is very far away from the gold surface. If so, it is normal to
>> find very small binding energies
>>
>> P.
>> ---
>> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Physics, University of Udine
>
> I've rerun from a different starting geometry, and it only partially solved 
> the problem. The optimum C-Au distance is now 2.24 Angstrom, and the new 
> CO-Au(111) adsorption energy is -0.003978 Rydberg = -0.055 eV. Again, this is 
> much smaller than the PBE CO/Au adsorption energy -0.26 eV from Quantum 
> Espresso calculations reported in PRB 77, 085414 (2008). I've done some 
> potential energy surface scans with rigid CO and Au groups, and haven't seen 
> anything helpful. I've attached my CO/Au(111) input file below. Any further 
> explanations of how my calculations differ from the above reference would be 
> appreciated. Thanks again.
>
> ?- BGJ
>
> &control
> ? ?calculation='relax'
> ? ?prefix='coau5-3x3-fcc3',
> ? ?pseudo_dir = '/home/bjanesko2/espresso/pseudo//',
> ? ?outdir='/tmp/espresso/'
> ?/
> ?&system
> ? ?ibrav=4,
> ? ?celldm(1)=9.439624066,
> ? ?celldm(3)=8.0,
> ? ?nat=17,
> ? ?ntyp=3,
> ? ?ecutwfc = 40.0,
> ? ?ecutrho = 250.0,
> ? ?occupations='smearing', smearing='marzari-vanderbilt', degauss=0.01
> ?/
> ?&electrons
> ? ?conv_thr=0.0000001
> ?/
> ?&ions
> ? ion_dynamics='bfgs',
> ? path_thr=0.03
> ?/
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> ?Au ?196.966 ?Au.pbe-nd-van.UPF
> ?C ? 12.0107 ?C-pbe-van_ak.UPF
> ?O ? 15.9994 ?O-pbe-van_ak.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS alat
> Au ? ? ?0.000000 ? ? ? ?0.000000 ? ? ? ?4.000000 ?1 1 1
> Au ? ? ?0.500000 ? ? ? ?0.288675 ? ? ? ?4.000000 ?1 1 1
> Au ? ? ?1.000000 ? ? ? ?0.577350 ? ? ? ?4.000000 ?1 1 1
> Au ? ? ?0.333333 ? ? ? ?0.000000 ? ? ? ?3.528595 ?1 1 1
> Au ? ? ?0.833333 ? ? ? ?0.288675 ? ? ? ?3.528595 ?1 1 1
> Au ? ? ?1.333333 ? ? ? ?0.577350 ? ? ? ?3.528595 ?1 1 1
> Au ? ? ?0.666667 ? ? ? ?0.000000 ? ? ? ?3.057191 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?1.166667 ? ? ? ?0.288675 ? ? ? ?3.057191 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?1.666667 ? ? ? ?0.577350 ? ? ? ?3.057191 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?1.000000 ? ? ? ?0.000000 ? ? ? ?2.585786 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?1.500000 ? ? ? ?0.288675 ? ? ? ?2.585786 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?2.000000 ? ? ? ?0.577350 ? ? ? ?2.585786 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?1.333333 ? ? ? ?0.000000 ? ? ? ?2.114382 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?1.833333 ? ? ? ?0.288675 ? ? ? ?2.114382 ?0 0 0
> Au ? ? ?2.333333 ? ? ? ?0.577350 ? ? ? ?2.114382 ?0 0 0
> C ? ? ? ?0.333333333 ? 0.000000000 ? 4.317809266452 1 1 1
> O ? ? ? ?0.333333333 ? 0.000000000 ? 4.546726732327 1 1 1
> K_POINTS automatic
> 8 8 1 0 0 0
>
>
>
> ===================
> Benjamin G. Janesko
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Chemistry
> Texas Christian University
> Office: SWR 428
> http://personal.tcu.edu/bjanesko/
> b.janesko at tcu.edu
> Phone: 1-817-257-6202
> Fax: 1-817-257-5851 (attn:janesko)
> ******************
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>

Reply via email to