On Aug 31, 2012, at 22:55 , Matthew M Montemore wrote: > I just wanted to make the community aware of this issue and help out > anyone having similar problems.
your help is very much appreciated. It will be even more appreciated if you provide an example of a pseudopotential that works if you remove the input data section (<PP_INPUT> ... </PP_INPUT> I guess), doesn't work as is (please also provide you definition of "doesn't work": yields an error while reading the pseudopotential file?). I hadn't checked if the pseudopotentials with the new input information actually work, but I don't see any reason why they shouldn't (and the only one I just tried seems to have no problem) Paolo --- Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment, Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
