Hi,
I need clarification on kinetic energy cutoff. I have a system comprising 32 
carbon atoms. Am I to consider total 32 carbon atoms in? convergence w.r.t 
kinetic energy cutoff scf calculation or the two carbon atoms in the unit cell.
Thank you for anticipated reply.
Yusuf




________________________________
 From: Stefano Baroni <baroni at sissa.it>
To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Error while parsing atomic positions
 



On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Kajal Jindal wrote:

Hi,
>
>I am trying to do the scf calculation on unit cell GaAs. But i am continously 
>observing an error "Error while parsing atomic positions" while running it. I 
>have checked the program several times but still not able to troubleshoot. I 
>am attaching my input and output file result along.
>
>input file
>
>&control 
>??? calculation='scf' 
>??? restart_mode='from_scratch' 
>??? prefix='GaAs' 
>??? wf_collect=.true., 
>??? pseudo_dir = '/root/pseudo', 
>??? outdir='/root/poonamGaAs/temp', 
>??? 
>?/ 
>?&system 
>??? ibrav=2, nat=10, ntyp= 2,celldm(1) = 10.20, 
>??? ecutwfc = 25.0,ecutrho=300, occupations ='fixed',? 
>?
>?/ 
>?&electrons 
>??? mixing_beta = 0.1 
>??? mixing_mode = 'plain'? 
>??? conv_thr =? 1.0e-5 
>??? diagonalization = 'david'?? 
>?/ 
>?
>ATOMIC_SPECIES 
>Ga? 69.72? Ga.pbe-n-van.UPF? 
>As? 74.92? As.pbe-n-van.UPF 
>ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal} 
>Ga 0.O? 0.0? 1.0 
>
this is an "O" (like Omar), not a "0" (zero)

SB

---
Stefano Baroni - SISSA??&??DEMOCRITOS National Simulation Center - Trieste
http://stefano.baroni.me/?[+39] 040 3787 406 (tel) -528 (fax) / stefanobaroni 
(skype)

La morale est une logique de l'action comme la logique est une morale de la 
pens?e - Jean Piaget 

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120926/7f9a02fe/attachment.htm
 

Reply via email to