Dear ding,
the question about V_bare falls within the FAQs of this forum. Please have
a look at
this thread,
for instance:
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/2006-October/005053.html
Honestly I don't understand completely the second part of your question.
Anyway, I think
that the potential due to an external electric field (the one you switch on
with tefield)
is added to the local potential, so that it is already included in V_bare (it
should be
called vltot in pwscf code).
Cheers,
GS
loc duong ding wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I wonder what is definition of V_bare and electric field potential in PWscf
> code. The
> electric field potential in Pwscf is the same as electrostatic potential?
>
> It may be a stupid question but I can not find the consistence in the name of
> potential
> as usual call.
>
> I appreciate your explaination!
>
> Sincerely, ----------------------------------------------- Loc Duong Dinh
> Ms-Ph.D
> Student Sungkyunkwan Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology, Sungkyunkwan
> University,
> Suwon, 440-746, Korea Email: mambom1902 at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
--
o ------------------------------------------------ o
| Gabriele Sclauzero, PhD Student |
| c/o: SISSA & CNR-INFM Democritos, |
| via Beirut 2-4, 34014 Trieste (Italy) |
| email: sclauzer at sissa.it |
| phone: +39 040 3787 511 |
| skype: gurlonotturno |
o ------------------------------------------------ o
