Me and Claudia are using intelmpi 4.0 in http://cystorm.ece.iastate.edu with a very good performance .. but we are not sure now ... let me explain :
We use a surface of Al with 81 in 128 cpus using intelMPI and openMPI 1.4 The compilations options (make.sys), input file and output files are in this page (sorry for use my page but was the more fast) : http://www.lpmd.cl/jperalta/index.php?n=Site.QE-Cystorm Probably is not a good test, because we detect after that the cluster schedule manager (torque) was not work properly with intelMPI and was very probably that some external works are using process in the open-mpi running. Look this thread about schedule-manager and intelMPI http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=76537 Right now the cluster is under a upgrade, sure when we can do more test we shared that. Best Regards Joaquin and Claudia. On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz at democritos.it>wrote: > Can anybody report any experience linking with Intel > version of MPI? > > P. > --- > Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Physics, University of Udine > via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy > Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > Pw_forum at pwscf.org > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Group of NanoMaterials ---------------------------------------------------- http://www.gnm.cl ---------------------------------------------------- Joaqu?n Andr?s Peralta Camposano ---------------------------------------------------- http://zeth.ciencias.uchile.cl/~jperalta<http://zeth.ciencias.uchile.cl/%7Ejperalta> In a world without frontiers, who needs Gates and Win. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20100818/4637f898/attachment.htm
