Sorry,  I was incorrect regarding ph.x and epsil=.false. combination!
I used your input files and everything has gone well on my notebook, including 
electric field corrections, even  epsil=.false. 

Bests,
Eyvaz.

--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Eyvaz Isaev <eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Eyvaz Isaev <eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] phonon dispersion calculation abruptly stops
> To: "PWSCF Forum" <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 12:35 AM
> 
> Dear Mikiyas,
> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 6/17/09, Mikiyas Tsegaye <mastermik at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> Let us analyse your input files.
> 
> Here is a sketch of your scf-input:
> 
> > &system
> > ibrav = 2, celldm(1) =10.56, nat=? 2,
> > ntyp= 1, ecutwfc = 22.0
> 
> That means you have a semiconductor (insulator). 
> 
> Now from ph-input:
> 
> > ldisp = .true.,
> > nq1 = 6, nq2 = 6, nq3 = 6,
> 
> I suggest ph.x starts for "Electric Field Calculations", as
> it does not see the keywords specific for the metallic case,
> but can not do it as you did not specify epsil=.true., i.e.
> calculate electric field corrections.
> By default epsil=.false., i.e. do not calculate "Electric
> Field Calculations" (sorry for some tautology) and then ph.x
> stops (most likely).
> 
> A short note on the mail subject: it is not connected with
> "phonon dispersion" calculations, this script produces only
> dynamical matricies for the q-mesh specified by nq1,nq2,nq3.
> 
> 
> Bests,
> Eyvaz.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof. Eyvaz Isaev, 
> Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of
> Steel & Alloys, Russia, 
> Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM),
> Linkoping University, Sweden 
> Condensed Matter Theory Group, Uppsala University, Sweden 
> Eyvaz.Isaev at fysik.uu.se,
> isaev at ifm.liu.se,
> eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 6/17/09, Mikiyas Tsegaye <mastermik at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Mikiyas Tsegaye <mastermik at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Pw_forum] phonon dispersion calculation
> abruptly stops
> > To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 10:40 PM
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm trying to calculate phonon dispersion for
> Germanium.
> > I have the pw.x and ph.x inputs prepared as follows:
> >
> *********************************************************************************************************
> > &control
> > ? ? calculation='scf',
> > ? ? restart_mode='from_scratch',
> > ? ? prefix='FF',
> > ? ? tprnfor = .true.,
> > ? ? pseudo_dir = '$PSEUDO_DIR/',
> > ? ? outdir='$TMP_DIR/'
> > /
> > &system
> > ? ? ibrav = 2, celldm(1) =10.56, nat=? 2,
> > ntyp= 1,
> > ? ? ecutwfc = 22.0
> > /
> > &electrons
> > ? ? mixing_beta = 0.7
> > ? ? conv_thr =? 1.0d-8
> > /
> > ATOMIC_SPECIES
> > Ge? 72.64? Ge.pz-bhs.UPF
> > ATOMIC_POSITIONS
> > Ge 0.00 0.00 0.00
> > Ge 0.25 0.25 0.25
> > K_POINTS
> > 10
> > ???0.1250000? 0.1250000?
> > 0.1250000???1.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.1250000?
> > 0.3750000???3.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.1250000?
> > 0.6250000???3.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.1250000?
> > 0.8750000???3.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.3750000?
> > 0.3750000???3.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.3750000?
> > 0.6250000???6.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.3750000?
> > 0.8750000???6.00
> > ???0.1250000? 0.6250000?
> > 0.6250000???3.00
> > ???0.3750000? 0.3750000?
> > 0.3750000???1.00
> > ???0.3750000? 0.3750000?
> > 0.6250000???3.00
> > 
> > EOF
> > $ECHO "? running pw.x to calculate scf...\c"
> > $PW_COMMAND < Ge.scfK.in > Ge.scfK.out
> > check_failure $?
> > $ECHO "done"
> > 
> > # try the whole dispersion
> > cat > Ge.phG.in << EOF
> > phonons of germanium
> > &INPUTPH
> > amass(1) = 72.640,
> > outdir = '$TMP_DIR/',
> > prefix = 'FF',
> > tr2_ph = 1.0d-14,
> > fildyn = 'FF.dynG',
> > ldisp = .true.,
> > nq1 = 6, nq2 = 6, nq3 = 6,
> > /
> > EOF
> > 
> > $ECHO "? running ph.x to calculate gamma
> > phonons...\c"
> > $PH_COMMAND < Ge.phG.in > Ge.phG.out
> > check_failure $?
> > $ECHO "done"
> > 
> >
> *******************************************************************************************
> > Now, the scf step finishes succesfully, but the ph.x
> step
> > only? 
> > finishes up to a certain point: It crashes with
> > "segementation fault".? 
> > The output file Ge.phG.out shows the following:
> > 
> >
> ************************************************************
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???Program PHONON? ?
> > v.4.0.5? starts ...
> > ? ???Today is 17Jun2009 at 10:43:58
> > 
> > ? ???Ultrasoft (Vanderbilt)
> > Pseudopotentials
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???Dynamical matrices for ( 6, 6, 6,)
> > uniform grid of q-points
> > ? ???(? 16q-points):
> > ? ? ???N? ?
> > ???xq(1)? ?
> > ???xq(2)? ?
> > ???xq(3)
> > ? ? ???1?
> > ???0.00000?
> > ???0.00000? ???0.00000
> > ? ? ???2? ?
> > -0.16667? ???0.16667? ?
> > -0.16667
> > ? ? ???3? ?
> > -0.33333? ???0.33333? ?
> > -0.33333
> > ? ? ???4?
> > ???0.50000? ? -0.50000?
> > ???0.50000
> > ? ? ???5?
> > ???0.00000?
> > ???0.33333? ???0.00000
> > ? ? ???6? ?
> > -0.16667? ???0.50000? ?
> > -0.16667
> > ? ? ???7?
> > ???0.66667? ? -0.33333?
> > ???0.66667
> > ? ? ???8?
> > ???0.50000? ? -0.16667?
> > ???0.50000
> > ? ? ???9?
> > ???0.33333?
> > ???0.00000? ???0.33333
> > ? ? ? 10?
> > ???0.00000?
> > ???0.66667? ???0.00000
> > ? ? ? 11?
> > ???0.83333? ? -0.16667?
> > ???0.83333
> > ? ? ? 12?
> > ???0.66667? ? -0.00000?
> > ???0.66667
> > ? ? ? 13?
> > ???0.00000? ? -1.00000?
> > ???0.00000
> > ? ? ? 14?
> > ???0.66667? ? -0.33333?
> > ???1.00000
> > ? ? ? 15?
> > ???0.50000? ? -0.16667?
> > ???0.83333
> > ? ? ? 16? ? -0.33333? ?
> > -1.00000? ???0.00000
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???bravais-lattice index?
> > ???=? ? ? ? ? ?
> > 2
> > ? ???lattice parameter
> > (a_0)???=? ? ? 10.5600?
> > a.u.
> > ? ???unit-cell volume? ?
> > ? ? ? =? ???294.3959
> > (a.u.)^3
> > ? ???number of atoms/cell? ?
> > ? =? ? ? ? ? ? 2
> > ? ???number of atomic types?
> > ? =? ? ? ? ? ? 1
> > ? ???kinetic-energy cut-off?
> > ? =? ? ? 22.0000? Ry
> > ? ???charge density cut-off?
> > ? =? ? ? 88.0000? Ry
> > ? ???convergence threshold?
> > ???=? ? ? 1.0E-14
> > ? ???beta? ? ? ?
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? =?
> > ? ???0.7000
> > ? ???number of iterations used =?
> > ? ? ? ? ? 4
> > ? ???Exchange-correlation? ?
> > ? =? SLA? PZ???NOGX NOGC
> > (1100)
> > 
> > 
> > ?
> > ???celldm(1)=???10.56000?
> > celldm(2)=? ? 0.00000? celldm(3)=?
> > ? 0.00000
> > ? ???celldm(4)=? ?
> > 0.00000? celldm(5)=? ? 0.00000?
> > celldm(6)=? ? 0.00000
> > 
> > ? ???crystal axes: (cart. coord. in
> > units of a_0)
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ???a(1) = ( -0.5000? 0.0000? 0.5000
> > )
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ???a(2) = (? 0.0000? 0.5000?
> > 0.5000 )
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ???a(3) = ( -0.5000? 0.5000? 0.0000
> > )
> > 
> > ? ???reciprocal axes: (cart. coord. in
> > units 2 pi/a_0)
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ???b(1) = ( -1.0000 -1.0000? 1.0000 )
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ???b(2) = (? 1.0000? 1.0000?
> > 1.0000 )
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ???b(3) = ( -1.0000? 1.0000 -1.0000 )
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???Atoms inside the unit cell:
> > 
> > ???Cartesian axes
> > 
> > ? ???site n.? atom? ?
> > ? mass? ? ? ?
> > ???positions (a_0 units)
> > ? ? ? ? 1? ? ? ?
> > Ge? 72.6400???tau( 1) = (? ?
> > 0.00000? ? 0.00000? ???
> > 0.00000? )
> > ? ? ? ? 2? ? ? ?
> > Ge? 72.6400???tau( 2) = (? ?
> > 0.25000? ? 0.25000? ???
> > 0.25000? )
> > 
> > ? ???Computing dynamical matrix for
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ? ? q = (? ? 0.00000? ?
> > 0.00000? ? 0.00000 )
> > 
> > ? ???49 Sym.Ops. (with q -> -q+G )
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???G cutoff =? 248.5712?
> > (???4111 G-vectors)?
> > ???FFT grid: ( 24, 24,? 
> > 24)
> > ? ???number of k
> > points=???10
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > ? ? ???cart. coord. in units
> > 2pi/a_0
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 1) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.1250000???0.1250000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.0625000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 2) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.1250000???0.3750000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.1875000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 3) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.1250000???0.6250000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.1875000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 4) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.1250000???0.8750000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.1875000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 5) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.3750000???0.3750000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.1875000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 6) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.3750000???0.6250000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.3750000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 7) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.3750000???0.8750000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.3750000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 8) =
> > (???0.1250000???0.6250000???0.6250000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.1875000
> > ? ? ? ? k(? ? 9) =
> > (???0.3750000???0.3750000???0.3750000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.0625000
> > ? ? ? ? k(???10) =
> > (???0.3750000???0.3750000???0.6250000),
> > wk =? ? 
> > 0.1875000
> > 
> > ? ???PseudoPot. # 1 for Ge read from
> > file Ge.pz-bhs.UPF
> > ? ???Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval
> > =? 4.0
> > ? ???Generated by new atomic code, or
> > converted to UPF format
> > ? ???Using radial grid of? 291
> > points,? 2 beta functions with:
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > l(1) =???0
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > l(2) =???1
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???Atomic displacements:
> > ? ???There are???2
> > irreducible representations
> > 
> > ? ???Representation?
> > ???1? ? ? 3 modes - To be
> > done
> > 
> > ? ???Representation?
> > ???2? ? ? 3 modes - To be
> > done
> > ? ???PHONON? ?
> > ???:? ???0.51s CPU
> > time,? ? 0.58s wall time
> > 
> > 
> > ? ???Alpha used in Ewald sum
> > =???0.9000
> > 
> > ? ???Electric Fields Calculation
> > 
> >
> *********************************************************************
> > 
> > Can anyone tell me why this is happening?
> > 
> > ---------
> > 
> > Mikiyas Tsegaye
> > University of Virginia
> > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
> > Charlottesville, VA, USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> > 
> 
> 
> ? ? ? 
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> 


      

Reply via email to