The problem is that the bottom surface should mimic the infinite bulk 
and saturating with pseudoH is the best way to achieve this purpose.
I suggest you to saturate also the top surface with pseudoH, this will 
made the system recover the right number of electrons.
Marcello

pw_forum-request at pwscf.org wrote:
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: "charge is wrong" error in semiconductor slab       calculation
>       (J. J. Ramsey)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:02:47 -0800 (PST)
> From: "J. J. Ramsey" <jjr19 at uakron.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] "charge is wrong" error in semiconductor slab
>       calculation
> To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
> Message-ID: <795126.3150.qm at web50905.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>   
>> From: Eyvaz Isaev <eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com>
>> To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 10:33:21 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] "charge is wrong" error in semiconductor slab 
>> calculation
>>
>> Hi, 
>>
>> The simplest way is looking at scf-output file, find a line like this
>>
>> number of electrons = 26.00
>>
>> and then you could ask yourself why I have 34.5 electrons.
>>     
>
> The output file reads
>
> number of electrons       =        34.50
>
> so I'm fine there. Each Ga and In atom contributes 3 electrons, each As atom 
> contributes 5, and each pseudohydrogen contributes 1.25, and if you do the 
> math, you get 34.5 electrons. My main concern is that I'm doing something 
> naive with the pseudohydrogens.
>
>
>
>       
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
> End of Pw_forum Digest, Vol 18, Issue 6
> ***************************************
>   

Reply via email to