Thank you very much, Paolo.
Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 17:05 , Miguel Mart?nez Canales wrote:
>
>> I've narrowed the
>> search, though, and the problem seems to arise whenever I call ph.x
>> with the "-npool" suffix. Is it stupid to run ph.x the following way?
>
> no, it is stupid that ph.x once again doesn't work with pools ...
> The problem is known (since yesterday), it should be limited
> to LSDA calculations, it is not yet fixed.
>
> There was also another problem with pools: if the number of
> pools is not a divisor of the number of k-points, pw.x may
> hang. This should be fixed in the current cvs.
>
> Paolo
> ---
> Paolo Giannozzi, Democritos and University of Udine, Italy
