Dear Lorenzo,

Many thanks for your additional explanations.

I also did appreciate a lot your previous explanations. It's simply
that I don't generate PP routinely, yet :-) and that I probably tend
to be too(?) peaky about the (gory) details; especially before burning
thousands cpu-hours.

All the best,
Max

Lorenzo Paulatto wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:58:35 +0100, Lat??vi Max LAWSON DAKU <Max.Lawson at 
> unige.ch> wrote:
>   
>> I thank you a lot for your answers:  I do understand  that
>> I should not worry about these warnings.
>>     
>
> Sometimes, when you are trying to generate a PP you get problems with 
> self-consistency; it may be difficult to understand which is the "bad" state 
> giving problem (assumed there there is only one, and your configuration is 
> not totally wrong), that's why I've added that message. Keeping in mind your 
> concerns, I may try to reword it in a less scary way.
>
> regards
>
>
>
>   

-- 
***********************************************
Latevi Max LAWSON DAKU
Departement de chimie physique 
Universite de Geneve - Sciences II
30, quai Ernest-Ansermet  
CH-1211 Geneve 4 
Switzerland 

Tel: (41) 22/379 6548 ++ Fax: (41) 22/379 6103
***********************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20090213/339e97c7/attachment.htm
 

Reply via email to