Thanks for your advice!! I will test ifort and I will compare it with Open64 or pathscale.
Regards Arturo El 05/06/12 11:40, GAO Zhe escribi?: > For AMD machine, you can try the free version of PathScale, which > shares the libraries with open64, but has better compability. > Further, according to my experience, even for AMD machine, ifort+MKL > provide higher efficiency than PathSclae+AMCL, this may be mainly > caused by the missing of FFTW (only FFT) in AMCL. > Of course, I have not tested every possibility, hope you can find > better compiler and math-libraries combination in AMD platform. > > -- > GAO Zhe > CMC Lab, Materials Science & Engineering Department, > Seoul National University, South Korea > > At 2012-06-05 17:11:03,Arturo <artginer at bifi.es> wrote: > > Now it gives me another error: > > mpif90 -O3 -ftpp -D__FFTW -D__MPI -D__PARA -I../include > -I../../iotk/src -I../../Modules -I. -c cglib.f90 > > real(DP) :: zmat( MAXVAL(descla(:)%nrlx), nudx, nspin ), > fmat( MAXVAL(descla(:)%nrlx), nudx, nspin ), fdiag( nx ) > ^ > openf95-870 openf90: ERROR CALCMT, File = cglib.f90, Line = 25, > Column = 25 > The intrinsic call "MAXVAL" is not valid in a specification > expression. > > real(kind=DP) z0( MAXVAL(descla(:)%nrlx), nudx, nspin ) > ^ > openf95-870 openf90: ERROR ROTATE, File = cglib.f90, Line = 102, > Column = 28 > The intrinsic call "MAXVAL" is not valid in a specification > expression. > > We have a machine with AMD interlagos processor and the vendor > recommend us to use this compiler Open64 from AMD. > > Thanks for your help!! > Arturo > > El 05/06/12 10:49, Lorenzo Paulatto escribi?: >> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Arturo <artginer at bifi.es >> <mailto:artginer at bifi.es>> wrote: >> >> real(dp), parameter :: fac = (1.d0/2.d0) * >> 1.d0/(3.d0*pi**2)**(1.d0/3.d0) >> >> ^ >> openf95-206 openf90: ERROR DO_RDG, File = elf.f90, Line = >> 203, Column = 70 >> The exponent in a constant initialization expression must >> be type >> integer. >> >> How can I solve it? >> >> >> Open the file with a text editor and replace the right-hand-side >> expression with its result: 0.161620459673995d0 >> >> But, where did you find this compiler? And, I'm just curious, why >> did you choose it? Are you sure it is reliable? >> >> bests >> >> -- >> Lorenzo Paulatto IdR @ IMPMC/CNRS & Universit? Paris 6 >> phone: +33 (0)1 44275 084 / skype: paulatz >> www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/ >> <http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/%7Epaulatto/> >> mail: 23-24/4?16 Bo?te courrier 115, 4 place Jussieu 75252 Paris >> C?dex 05 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pw_forum mailing list >> Pw_forum at pwscf.org >> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum > > > -- > Arturo Giner Gracia > HPC research group System Administrator > Instituto de Biocomputaci?n y F?sica de Sistemas Complejos (BIFI) > Universidad de Zaragoza > e-mail:artginer at bifi.es > phone: (+34) 976762992 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > Pw_forum at pwscf.org > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120606/7b573fcd/attachment.htm
