> > it doesn't matter which k-point in the star we take as representative > of the entire star (with weight proportional to the no. of k-points in the > star). k and k+G are equivalent. Also note that k and -k are > equivalent (by time reversal symmetry) > > Paolo > > > Oh I get it!! Thank you very much. Just to summarize it,
It is enough to work in the unit cell prescribed by the reciprocal lattice vectors and generate the k-points there. regards Meenakshi Sundaram M Grad Student Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Ithaca Cornell -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120629/303afcda/attachment.htm
