On Nov 1, 2011, at 16:43 , Alexander Urban wrote: > If this reasoning is correct, I would take a closer look at > `c_phase_field()' and estimate the effort to introduce the changes.
it might actually be sufficient, as a quick-and-dirty fix, to replace
the line
l_cal=.true.
with
l_cal= (nb <= nelec/2) .and. (mb <= nelec/2)
P.
---
Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
