Thanks, I tried to use "<" instead of "-in" it also didn't work. OK,I will try to use full paths for input and output, and answer about result.
----- ???????? ????????? ----- ??: Omololu Akin-Ojo <prayerz.omo at gmail.com> ??????????: 7 ????? 2011 ?. 9:56 ????: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org> ????: Re: [Pw_forum] ??: Re: problem in MPI running of QE (16 processors) Try to see if specifying the full paths help. E.g., try something like: mpiexec /home/MyDir/bin/pw.x -in /scratch/MyDir/graph.inp > /scratch/MyDir/graph.out (where /home/MyDir/bin is the full path to your pw.x and /scratch/MyDir/graph.inp is the full path to your output ....) ( I see you use "-in" instead of "<" to indicate the input. I don't know too much but _perhaps_ you could also _try_ using "<" instead of "-in") . o. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Alexander Kvashnin <agkvashnin at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I wrote > > #PBS -l nodes=16:ppn=4 > > And in userguide of MIPT-60 wrote,that mpiexec must choose number of > processors automatically, that's why I didn't write anything else > > > ________________________________ > ????: Huiqun Zhou <hqzhou at nju.edu.cn> > ????????????????????: 7 ?????????? 2011 ??. 7:52 > ????????: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org> > ????????: Re: [Pw_forum] problem in MPI running of QE (16 processors) > > How did you apply number of node, procs per node in your job > script? > > #PBS -l nodes=?:ppn=? > > zhou huiqun > @earth sciences, nanjing university, china > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Alexander G. Kvashnin > To: PWSCF Forum > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 2:53 AM > Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] problem in MPI running of QE (16 processors) > I create PBS task on supercomputer MIPT-60 where I write > > mpiexec ../../espresso-4.2.1/bin/pw.x -in graph.inp > output.opt > all other [??????? ?? ???? ????? ????????? ?????????]
