Dear Giovanni, if I am not wrong github is for git version management. Most of the projects on qe-forge use svn or cvs. When we decide to move from cvs to svn we also have considered the possibility of moving to git. However, as we say in italianish "we know our chickens", and the "unlimited" freedom that gives git could have introduced many coordination issues in the quantum ESPRESSO global management.
thank you for your suggestion Layla 2012/5/18 Giovanni Cangiani <giovanni.cangiani at epfl.ch> > what about github ? > > best, > > Giovanni > > -- > Giovanni Cangiani > > On May 18, 2012, at 8:58, Layla Martin-Samos <lmartinsamos at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Dear all, we are thinking in moving qe-forge from fusionforge to gforge. > Unfortunately it seems that gforge ask for a commercial License which > pro-year prince will depends on the number of users. As all of you know, > nor Quantum ESPRESSO nor qe-forge have any direct financial support, so we > can not afford big expenses. In order to reduce potential costs of the > gforge commercial License, our system administrator has eliminated all the > qe-forge users that are not bound to any qe-forge project. Depending on the > License price then or we move to gforge or we stay with fusionforge. In any > case we will let you know in order to rationalize the qe-forge users. > > > > Sorry for the inconvenience, best regards > > > > Layla > > _______________________________________________ > > Pw_users mailing list > > Pw_users at pwscf.org > > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_users > _______________________________________________ > Q-e-developers mailing list > Q-e-developers at qe-forge.org > http://qe-forge.org/mailman/listinfo/q-e-developers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20120518/e2e5531e/attachment-0001.htm
