>Then,? may I make a conclusion that this structure or composition is unstable?
?
If? you have imaginary frequency, yes. If the structure is a high temperature 
phase, it is another story. DFPT works at? low? temperatures (strongly speaking 
at T=0K).

Bests,
Eyvaz.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof. Eyvaz Isaev, 
Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linkoping University, 
Sweden 
Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of Steel & Alloys, 
Russia, 
isaev at ifm.liu.se, eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com


________________________________
From: GAO Zhe <[email protected]>
? .

I have obtained the convergent result by decreasing alpha_mix(1) from 0.7 to 
0.4. But the result has imaginary frequency (about -80 cm^-1) at X(100).
Further more, I also tried VCA (by virtual.x) +DFPT method for the same 
composition and strucutre, X(100) still had imaginary frequency (also about -80 
cm^-1).
Then,? may I make a conclusion that this structure or composition is unstable?
Looking forward to your reply.
Best Regards.

--
GAO Zhe
CMC Lab, MSE, SNU, Seoul, S.Korea

At 2011-07-17 15:39:13,"Eyvaz?Isaev"?<eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I was not sure whether this problem caused by empty-band number, so I 
> increase nbnd.
>?
>You should increase nbnd if you see "too few bands" message? in *.ph.out file. 
>
>Bests,
>Eyvaz. 
>?
>
>?
>
>
>________________________________
>From: GAO Zhe <flux_ray12 at 163.com>
>To: Eyvaz Isaev <eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com>; PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 11:33 AM
>Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] ph.x cannot reach convergence within 100 steps
>
>
>Thank you very much, Prof. Isaev.
>I tried all of 'scf', 'relax' and 'vc-relax' before ph.x, but got the same 
>problem in each case~
>I was not sure whether this problem caused by empty-band number, so I increase 
>nbnd. It may too large for my model~ Now, I am trying to change the values of 
>alpha_mix(1) and nmix_ph for a better convergent.
>Thank you, again ^_^
>
>--
>GAO Zhe
>CMC Lab, MSE, SNU, Seoul, S.Korea
>
>At 2011-07-16 16:39:40?"Eyvaz?Isaev"?<eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Hi, 
>>
>>
>>
>>>Recently, I am trying to calculate phonon dispersion via ph.x. However, 
in some cases, ph.x cannot reach convergence within 100 steps and stop 
>automaticly.
>>?
>>1. You should? perform 'scf', not 'vc-relax' before phonon calculations.
>>2. You have a rather large system (nbnd=100), but used alpha_mix(1) by 
>>default (0.7). Try it around 0.1.
>>3. Try changing nmix_ph (by default 4).
>>4. If this does not help change 'maxter=100' in phcom.f90 and recompile.
>>
>>Bests,
>>Eyvaz.
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Prof. Eyvaz Isaev, 
>>Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linkoping University, 
>>Sweden 
>>Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of Steel & Alloys, 
>>Russia, 
>>isaev at ifm.liu.se, eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>From: GAO?Zhe <flux_ray12 at 163.com>
>>To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
>>Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 7:40 AM
>>Subject: [Pw_forum] ph.x cannot reach convergence within 100 steps
>>
>>
>>Dear QE developer and users:
>>Recently, I am trying to calculate phonon dispersion via ph.x. However, in 
>>some cases, ph.x cannot reach convergence within 100 steps and stop 
>>automaticly.
>>I have tested the convergent lattice parameter, cut-off energy and k-points 
>>(M-P grid), and the thresholds of force and stress were also very low. Even 
>>if I increase the tr2_ph from
 1.0d-12 (default) to 1.0d-10, the |ddv_scf|^2? values was around 10^(-6) or 
10^(-7) magnitude. The problem usually occurred at the second q-point, but 
sometimes, even if lucky enough, it would definitely occur at
 the third q-point (4 q-points in 3x3x3 case).
>>Are there any methods to solve this problem? Any suggestion will be welcome.
>>Calculations were used GGA-PBE USPP.
>>This is my input file:
>>cat >W25.relax.in <<EOF
>>&control
>>???? calculation = 'vc-relax' ,
>>???? disk_io = 'low' ,
>>???? prefix = 'W' ,
>>???? outdir = '$TempDIR/' ,
>>???? pseudo_dir = '$PseudoDIR/' ,
>>???? etot_conv_thr = 1.0d-12 ,
>>???? forc_conv_thr = 1.0d-4 ,
>>/
>>&system
>>???? ibrav = 1 ,
>>???? celldm(1) = ******* ,
>>???? nat = ** ,
>>???? ntyp = 3 ,
>>???? nbnd = 100 ,
>>???? ecutwfc = 47.5 ,
>>???? ecutrho = 450 ,
>>???? occupations =
 'smearing' ,
>>???? smearing = 'mp' ,
>>???? degauss = 0.003 ,
>>/
>>&electrons
>>???? conv_thr = 1.0d-12 ,
>>???? startingpot = 'atomic' ,
>>???? startingwfc = 'atomic+random' ,
>>???? diagonalization = 'cg' ,
>>???? electron_maxstep = 150 ,
>>/
>>&ions
>>???? ion_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
>>/
>>&cell
>>???? cell_dynamics = 'bfgs' ,
>>???? press_conv_thr = 0.01 ,
>>/
>>ATOMIC_SPECIES
>>? V?? 50.9415?? V.pbe-n-van.UPF
>>? W?? 183.800?? W.pbe-nsp-van.UPF
>>? C?? 12.0110?? C.pbe-van_ak.UPF
>>ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
>>? V?? 0.50? 0.50? 0.00
>>...........
>>? C?? 0.50? 0.50? 0.50
>>K_POINTS
 automatic
>>13? 13? 13?? 0? 0? 0
>>EOF
>>echo -e "? Relaxing Structure...\c"
>>$MPIBIN/mpirun -n 6 pw.x -npool 2 <W.relax.in >W.relax.out
>>echo -e " DONE"
>>
>>cat >W.ph.in <<EOF
>>Phonon Calculation
>>&inputph
>>???? outdir = '$TempDIR/' ,
>>???? prefix = 'W' ,
>>???? ldisp = .true. ,
>>???? nq1 = 3 ,
>>???? nq2 = 3 ,
>>???? nq3 = 3 ,
>>???? tr2_ph = 1.0d-10 ,
>>???? fildyn = 'W.dyn' ,
>>/
>>EOF
>>echo -e "? Calculating Dynamic Matrix...\c"
>>$MPIBIN/mpirun -n 6 ph.x -npool 2 <W.ph.in >W.ph.out
>>echo -e " DONE"
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>GAO Zhe
>>CMC Lab, MSE, SNU, Seoul, S.Korea
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Pw_forum mailing list
>>Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>>http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pw_forum mailing list
>Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110721/a75fcfeb/attachment.htm
 

Reply via email to