Are you using the most recent version of intel fortran compiler (it's called XE, or 11.0)? It has a lot of problem, we've been discussing the issue some time ago: it definitely is a miscompilation problem. I have a stinky workaround, but the best solution is to downgrade the compiler.
cheers On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:10:56 +0100, O. Baris Malcioglu <baris.malcioglu at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > I've also started getting a lot of IOTK errors recently using the CVS > version. > I've got two possible candidates, > 1)highly asynchronous file system (i.e. a parallel system that is not > robust > in the sense of NFS, and highly overloaded) > 2) a conspiracy going on with the newest intel compilers running in an > environment that is not-so-new. > Since this error is annoyingly frequent but not replicable at will, could > you please contact me if you are using a asynchronous file system with > the > compilers you are using? , > Best, > Baris Malcioglu > P.S. The parallel file systems optimized for performance tend to be > asynchronous, full list can be found here: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems> > > ################################################################################ > ######################################## > # FROM IOTK LIBRARY, VERSION 1.2.0 > # UNRECOVERABLE ERROR (ierr=1) > # ERROR IN: iotk_scan_tag (iotk_scan.spp:468) > # CVS Revision: 1.23 > # > iostat=67 > # ERROR IN: iotk_scan (iotk_scan.spp:743) > # CVS Revision: 1.23 > # ERROR IN: iotk_scan_end (iotk_scan.spp:233) > # CVS Revision: 1.23 > # foundl > # ERROR IN: iotk_close_read (iotk_files.spp:645) > # CVS Revision: 1.20 > ################################################################################ > ######################################## > > > 2010/12/8 W2AGZ <w2agz at w2agz.com> > >> Thanks, Paolo. I'll look into it ths week. -Paul >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org [mailto:pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org] On >> Behalf Of Paolo Giannozzi >> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:49 AM >> To: PWSCF Forum >> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] iotk error - again >> >> On Dec 7, 2010, at 8:33 , W2AGZ wrote: >> >> > "replace q_real by q_real_space." Is this the fix? >> > >> >> >> no. This is the fix for a very specific case, and the only one I >> remember >> in >> which an error was issued by iotk for a good reason (i.e. a variable was >> written with one name and read with another). All other instances of >> iotk >> errors I remember are related to miscompilation. >> >> Try first of all to compile iotk with reduced optimization (e.g. using >> $(MAKE) FFLAGS="$(FFLAGS_NOOPT)" ) >> >> P. >> --- >> Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics, Univ. Udine via delle >> Scienze >> 208, 33100 Udine, Italy Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pw_forum mailing list >> Pw_forum at pwscf.org >> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pw_forum mailing list >> Pw_forum at pwscf.org >> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum >> -- Lorenzo Paulatto (IdR) IMPMC - CNRS UMR 7590 & Universit? P&M Curie T23-C13/23-5e27 - 4 place Jussieu - 75252 Paris Cedex5 phone: +33 (0)144 27 5211 www: http://www-int.impmc.upmc.fr/~paulatto/
