Dear Giovani
 
I personnaly did calculations on Fe clusters some time ago. I always found 
"almost integer" magnetic moments.
However I once encoutered some difficulties with the default  value of "nbnd". 
I had to increase it. Try to set nbnd=20 for example...
 
Magnetic clusters can be very tricky.. It also very common to find several 
magnetic solutions..
 
good luck
 
 cyrille
 
================================================================== 
Cyrille Barreteau                                                      phone : 
+33 (0)1 69 08 29 51 
CEA Saclay                                                             fax :    
  +33 (0)1 69 08 84 46 
IRAMIS, SPCSI,    Batiment 462                            email     
cyrille.barreteau at cea.fr 
91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex 
FRANCE 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
Web: http://iramis.cea.fr/Pisp/cyrille.barreteau/ 
==================================================================

________________________________

De: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org de la part de Giovani Faccin
Date: lun. 14/02/2011 05:50
?: PWSCF Forum
Objet : Re: [Pw_forum] RE : A question on atomic magnetic moments


Dear Cyrille,

First of all, thanks for the reply on my post.

Following your suggestion, I've run a few calculations with lower degauss 
values. In particular, the ones reported on the message for Duy Le were made 
with a much smaller value ( 0.005 ) than the original 0.02 from the first 
message. Besides that, I've tried degauss values as low as 0.002 without any 
significant improvement on the final magnetization. 

I'm still wondering how do people find 6.00 so easily for the magnetization. 
I'm trying with 2 different DFT codes and no way I'm reaching those results, 
even though bulk/dimer equilibrium distances and force constants appear to be 
ok.

Any other ideas, just tell me, I'll try it and report back on the list.

Thanks again,

Giovani



2011/2/13 BARRETEAU Cyrille <cyrille.barreteau at cea.fr>


        Dear Giovani
        Try to decrease the degauss value of your smearing.. and see what 
happens.
        
         cyrille
        
        
        ==================================================================
        Cyrille Barreteau                                                      
phone : +33 (0)1 69 08 29 51
        CEA Saclay                                                             
fax :      +33 (0)1 69 08 84 46
        IRAMIS, SPCSI,    Batiment 462                            email     
cyrille.barreteau at cea.fr
        91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
        FRANCE
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Web: http://iramis.cea.fr/Pisp/cyrille.barreteau/
        ==================================================================
        
        ________________________________
        
        De: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org de la part de Giovani Faccin
        Date: dim. 13/02/2011 07:16
        ?: PWSCF Forum
        Objet : Re: [Pw_forum] A question on atomic magnetic moments
        
        
        Dear Paolo,
        
        Thanks for the reply.
        
        Just to make sure that the simulation cell size is not an issue (so 
that the system is really finite), I've tested different possibilities, 
including some quite big cells. Still, after a certain size the value of the 
magnetization is converging to 6.82 instead of the expected 6.
        
        So something else is causing this. Unfortunately I've got no clue as to 
what could it be.
        
        Should it be of any help, this is my input file:
        
        
         &CONTROL
                        calculation = 'scf' ,
                       restart_mode = 'from_scratch' ,
                         wf_collect = .true. ,
                             outdir = './output' ,
                         pseudo_dir = '../pseudo/' ,
                             prefix = 'fe' ,
                      etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-9 ,
                      forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-6 ,
                            tstress = .true. ,
                            tprnfor = .true. ,
         /
         &SYSTEM
                              ibrav = 1,
                          celldm(1) = 43,
                                nat = 2,
                               ntyp = 1,
                            ecutwfc = 100 ,
                            ecutrho = 300 ,
                        occupations = 'smearing' ,
                            degauss = 0.02 ,
                           smearing = 'methfessel-paxton' ,
                              nspin = 2 ,
          starting_magnetization(1) = 1.0,
         /
         &ELECTRONS
                           conv_thr = 1.0e-9 ,
                        mixing_beta = 0.7 ,
                    diagonalization = 'david' ,
         /
        ATOMIC_SPECIES
          Fe   58.69000  Fe.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
        ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
          Fe      0.000000000    0.000000000    0.000000000
          Fe      2.047510       0.000000000    0.000000000
        K_POINTS automatic
         1 1 1   1 1 1
        
        Any suggestions are highly welcome.
        
        Giovani
        
        
        
        2011/2/12 Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz at democritos.it>
        
        
        
               On Feb 11, 2011, at 17:09 , Giovani Faccin wrote:
        
               > My question: shouldn't those numbers be integers?
        
        
               only in finite systems, if you neglect spin-orbit.
        
               P.
               ---
               Paolo Giannozzi, Dept of Chemistry&Physics&Environment,
               Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
               Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
        
        
        
        
               _______________________________________________
               Pw_forum mailing list
               Pw_forum at pwscf.org
               http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
        
        
        
        
        
        --
        Giovani
        
        
        _______________________________________________
        Pw_forum mailing list
        Pw_forum at pwscf.org
        http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
        
        




-- 
Giovani

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 12291 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : 
http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20110214/7f73a8d3/attachment.bin
 

Reply via email to