Dear Paul, How are you? I hope you are fine and enjoying the holidays.
I filled out the tie card today. I saw one of the funding is not there: the TE funding. The ABSCO, I think, will be out in the next week. If you don?t mind, could you renew these 2 funding if possible. You don?t have to do it now, since it is holiday time now, and you probably have your own plan in the holidays. I just let you know in advance since the week after New Year, I will need them for charging the time card. I emailed you the data last week of the nscf run using the scf 9x9x9. I am waiting for your calculation of Seebeck coefficient, so that I can decide whether I should run the scf 9x9x9 for the one atom case. I don?t mean to ask you to do it now since it is your holidays, and you need to enjoy too. I will fly back on Jan. 3, and from Jan 4 to Jan 6, I have class. I am not sure if I can do anything much after the class. I will try to work if I am not very tired. See you after Jan. 6. HAPPY NEW YEAR! Trinh On 12/30/10 8:37 AM, "Eyvaz Isaev" <eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com> wrote: Dear Zhou, It is a good idea citing the paper as it contains all formulas used to calculate \lambda. Bests, Eyvaz. ________________________________ From: Xiang-FengZhou <[email protected]> To: pw_forum at pwscf.org Sent: Thu, December 30, 2010 2:58:20 PM Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Reference of example07 (version 4.2.1) (Eyvaz Isaev) Dear Eyvaz, Thanks a lot for such quick response. I want to know the current method which is just implemented in espresso-4.2.1. I guess it may be arXiv:cond-mat/0504077v2 <http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0504077v2> with the title "Origins of low- and high-pressure discontinuities of Tc in niobium". But I am not very sure about it. Best regards, Xiang-Feng Zhou Nankai University >Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Reference of example07 (version 4.2.1) >To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org> >Message-ID: <642054.81981.qm at web65713.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Hi, > >>From: Xiang-FengZhou <zxf888 at 163.com> > >>which will be the best reference for the example07 (electron-phonon >>calculation) >>within the >version of 4.1 or 4.2.1 ? >If you mean which one 4.1 or 4.2.1 is better for \lambda calculations, you can >use both, in my experience I do not see any difference between&n bsp;them. > > >You can try CVS version which should give additional information (lambda.out) >with \lambda and T_c). Hopefully it contains changes I have made in July. > > >Bests, >Eyvaz. > ------------------------------------------------------------------- >Prof. Eyvaz Isaev, >Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linkoping University, >Sweden > >Theoretical Physics Department, Moscow State Institute of Steel & Alloys, >Russia, > >isaev at ifm.liu.se, eyvaz_isaev at yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.democritos.it/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20101230/22e146a8/attachment-0001.htm
