Hi
I propose to fix only 3 or 4 first layers and permit another layers to be 
optimized. When you change the first layer's positions manually, you force the 
atoms to pass the potential barrier. I think the code's algorithms (such as 
another codes) can raise small value to the potential, and if the potential 
barrier is high, it can not change the atoms very high to pass it. It finds 
only local minimum around it.
?
With the Best Regards


Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani
Associate Professor of Physical Chemistry
Address:
Department of Chemistry,
School of Science,
Payame Noor University (PNU),
Ardakan,
Yazd,
Iran.
E-mails: 
1- reza_b_m_a at yahoo.com (preferred),
2- behjatmanesh at pnu.ac.ir, 
3- reza.b.m.a at gmail.com.



On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 4:13 AM, "Li, Run" <run.li at my.und.edu> wrote:
 
 
Hello,
?
I have a questions about relax and vc-relax using pw.x. I tried to use them to 
optimize the geometry of graphite, and the atoms can barely move even though I 
move them manually I can get lower energy. I?m not sure why.
?
For example, I take 7 layers of ABAB stacked grapheme, fix the bottom 6 layers 
using the geometry parameters of graphite(000 thing), and relax the top layer. 
Geometry is defined as ibrav=14, celldm(1)=xx, celldm(3)=22.0(should be big 
enough), nosym=.true. Default bfgs optimization parameters are taken. ?The 
calculation usually takes a few iterations and stops, with the top layer moved 
by only 0.0002 A. But if I manually pull the top layer away by 0.7A, the energy 
lowers by 0.0005Ry. It also didn?t help by increasing trust_radius_max and 
trust_radius_ini to 3.0 and 1.0. Is this behavior expected? How do I make it 
converge to a real minimum?
?
I can run test calculation example02/al001.mm.in just fine.
?
Thank you very much,
?
Rain
Department of Chemistry
University of North Dakota
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://pwscf.org/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20131209/90214bee/attachment.html
 

Reply via email to