Dear Manu, I am a little bit confused, did you have the error with pw.x, or with band.x? Could you please provide a package including all of your input and output, so I can try to see if I can reproduce the error.
=================== Dr. Xiaochuan Ge (Giovanni) Center for Functional Nanomaterials Brookhaven national laboratory =================== On 9 November 2014 18:02, Manu Hegde <[email protected]> wrote: > HI Ge, > > Here is my input file and Kpoints. Still it is showing the same error. > > &CONTROL > calculation = 'scf' , > restart_mode = 'from_scratch' , > outdir = '/home/manu/espresso-5.1/bin/GaO_K/' , > pseudo_dir = '/home/manu/espresso-5.1/pseudo/' , > prefix = 'gafewband' , > verbosity = 'default' , > / > &SYSTEM > ibrav = 13, > A = 12.208 , > B = 3.031 , > C = 5.751 , > cosAB = 0 , > cosAC = -0.23 , > cosBC = 0 , > nat = 20, > ntyp = 2, > ecutwfc = 70 , > ecutrho = 800 , > nbnd = 90, > occupations = 'smearing' , > degauss = 0.001 , > smearing = 'gaussian' , > / > &ELECTRONS > electron_maxstep = 200, > conv_thr = 5.D-10 , > startingpot = 'file' , > startingwfc = 'atomic' , > mixing_mode = 'TF' , > mixing_beta = 0.4 , > mixing_ndim = 10, > diagonalization = 'david' , > / > ATOMIC_SPECIES > Ga 69.72300 Ga.pbe-n-van.UPF > O 15.99400 O.pbe-van_ak.UPF > ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal > Ga 0.909000000 1.000000000 0.205000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.841000000 0.500000000 0.685000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.659000000 1.000000000 0.315000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.591000000 0.500000000 0.795000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.409000000 0.500000000 0.205000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.341000000 1.000000000 0.685000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.159000000 0.500000000 0.315000000 1 1 1 > Ga 0.091000000 1.000000000 0.795000000 1 1 1 > O 0.996000000 0.500000000 0.253000000 1 1 1 > O 0.827000000 1.000000000 0.439000000 1 1 1 > O 0.834000000 1.000000000 0.891000000 1 1 1 > O 0.673000000 0.500000000 0.561000000 1 1 1 > O 0.666000000 0.500000000 0.109000000 1 1 1 > O 0.496000000 1.000000000 0.253000000 1 1 1 > O 0.504000000 1.000000000 0.747000000 1 1 1 > O 0.327000000 0.500000000 0.439000000 1 1 1 > O 0.334000000 0.500000000 0.891000000 1 1 1 > O 0.166000000 1.000000000 0.109000000 1 1 1 > O 0.173000000 1.000000000 0.561000000 1 1 1 > O 0.000400000 0.500000000 0.747000000 1 1 1 > K_POINTS tpiba_b > 6 > 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.000000000 1.000000000 > 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.000000000 1.000000000 > 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 1.000000000 > 0.500000000 0.000000000 0.500000000 1.000000000 > 0.500000000 0.500000000 0.500000000 1.000000000 > 0.000000000 0.500000000 0.500000000 1.000000000 > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:04 PM, xiaochuan Ge <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sorry I made a mistake, you do not set this variable by hand, you should >> use kpoint 0 0 0 instead of using kpoint{gamma} >> >> >> On Friday, November 7, 2014, xiaochuan Ge <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You may want to try to set "gamma_only=.false." In your scf calculation. >>> >>> On Friday, November 7, 2014, Manu Hegde <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> I am using latest version if QE (5.1). Is the error regarding gamma >>>> point fixed.? I was just trying to plot the bands it was showing the same >>>> error. I have gone through the previous threads, I did what suggested by >>>> you guys. But still it is showing the error. Any suggestions?. >>>> >>>> Error in routine bands (1): >>>> gamma_only case not implemented >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Manu >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> =================== >>> Dr. Xiaochuan Ge (Giovanni) >>> Center for Functional Nanomaterials >>> Brookhaven national laboratory >>> =================== >>> >>> >> >> -- >> =================== >> Dr. Xiaochuan Ge (Giovanni) >> Center for Functional Nanomaterials >> Brookhaven national laboratory >> =================== >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pw_forum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum >
_______________________________________________ Pw_forum mailing list [email protected] http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
