Dear S. Appalakondaiah,

As a matter of fact the cells are not very different: If you exchange the two vectors and take the inverse of the third one you will get the other case. Figuring out the corresponding directions is a rewarding and useful exercise - you might also learn something about the symmetry operations, three-dimensional lattices etc while doing it. Good Luck! :)

    Greetings from Paris,

       apsi

-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
  Ari Paavo Seitsonen / [email protected] / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
  Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
  Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25    (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935


On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Kondaiah Samudrala wrote:


Dear Sir,

I Completed the Phonon calculations with IBRAV=7 option...Its quite difficult 
to reperform the calculations. Can you please provide the IBZ path or source 
for obtain the IBZ???

with regards

S. Appalakondaiah

PhD student

University of Hyderabad


On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Kondaiah Samudrala <[email protected]> 
wrote:
      Dear all,
I am still confused with notation of Ibrav=7 in pwscf. The IBRV=7  primitive 
cell vectors in pwscf are quite different from any other. See below for two 
cases of primitive vectors IBRAV=7
Case1
For. e.g. In pwscf primitive vectors of IBRV=7 are
     crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of a)
               a(1) = (   0.500000  -0.500000   c/a)  
               a(2) = (   0.500000   0.500000   c/a )  
               a(3) = (  -0.500000  -0.500000   c/a )  
Case 2
On the other hand, generally people used as (from published papers)
     crystal axes: (cart. coord. in units of a)
               a(1) = (  -0.500000  0.500000    c/a)  
               a(2) = (   0.500000   -0.500000   c/a )  
               a(3) = (   0.500000   0.500000   -c/a ) .

This variation leads to changes in reciprocal vectors and then IBZ path. >From 
Wikipedia (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927025610002697) and 
http://www.cryst.ehu.es/ , I obtained the IBZ path for
case 2.  But, what about the IBZ path of case 1 primitive cell vectors??  Is 
both are same ??? But Xcrysden showing something else than regular Gamma, Z, 
Sigma, P and N points .

I feel puzzled, would some one give some idea about this? any help will be 
appreciated
with regards
S. Appalakondaiah
PhD StudentUniversity of Hyderabad
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to