Dear Bipul
I've tried to run your input file, and I suppose that your calculation does not 
converge because of the strong vertical dipole related to the 0001 
wurtzite slab, which you could try to visualize by calculating the planar 
average of the KS potential. My suggestion is to increase the vacuum to 
decouple the images, but it could be not sufficient, because the dipole should 
be quite strong. This is also a good reason for strange work-function 
numbers. AFAIK the polar ZnO surfaces are rarely exposed in real systems. The 
most stable and common surface is the nonpolar (10-10) one, which does 
not usually show any convergence problem. Buy you know what surface you need...
HTH
Giuseppe

On Friday, May 08, 2015 12:29:25 AM Bipul Rakshit wrote:
> Dear users,
> I am doing ZnO slab calculation with 12 Double layer of ZnO. Since ZnO is a
> wide band-gap material, so I am using occupation=fixed. I attached my input
> also.
> But why the calculation is not converging?
> 
> But when I am using occupation=smearing, it do converge. But it gives a
> work function of 3.47 eV after applying the dipole correction.
> 
> So what mistake I am doing?
> 
> Please help me in this regards

********************************************************
- Article premier - Les hommes naissent et demeurent
libres et ègaux en droits. Les distinctions sociales
ne peuvent être fondèes que sur l'utilitè commune
- Article 2 - Le but de toute association politique
est la conservation des droits naturels et 
imprescriptibles de l'homme. Ces droits sont la libertè,
la propriètè, la sùretè et la rèsistance à l'oppression.
********************************************************

   Giuseppe Mattioli                            
   CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA   
   v. Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10                
   I 00015 - Monterotondo Stazione (RM), Italy    
   Tel + 39 06 90672836 - Fax +39 06 90672316    
   E-mail: <[email protected]>
   http://www.ism.cnr.it/english/staff/mattiolig
   ResearcherID: F-6308-2012

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to