Thanks a lot sir,i have taken width of the ribbon is 4,but now in my calculation it is becoming two times ,that means 8 sir,which i am not able to understand sir,why it is happening like this sir.Please help me in this matter sir. regards
Surender Pratap Research Scholar Physics Department BITS Pilani,Pilani Campus Rajsthan-333031(INDIA)... Mob-7891949445 *Birla Institute of Technology & Science,* Pilani Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Giovanni Cantele < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear S. P., > > 8 could be the right or the wrong Number, it depends on which are the > orientation and the width of the nanoribbon. How did you choose that > number? Nobody will be able to provide help if you do not provide > sufficient information. > > Giovanni > > Inviato da iPad > > Il giorno 16/giu/2015, alle ore 14:45, Surender Pratap < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > Dear all users > > Can any body tell me please how many atoms are taken into supercells of > Hamiltonian,in my calculation of graphene nanoribbons ,i am taking 8,is it > right to take 8 ,how 8 are coming i am not able to understand. > > regards > > Surender Pratap > Research Scholar > Physics Department > BITS Pilani,Pilani Campus Rajsthan-333031(INDIA)... > Mob-7891949445 > > > *Birla Institute of Technology & Science,* Pilani > > Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India > > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum > > > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum >
_______________________________________________ Pw_forum mailing list [email protected] http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
