Sorry, I should've mentioned.
I asked them but they said there might be something wrong with the QE input
file. If that was the case, the file shouldn't have been running fine with
7 processors but it is. Could there really be something wrong with the
input file ?
Sorry if I am asking stupid doubts but I am little new at this.
Vishal Gupta
B.Tech. 3rd year Mechanical
Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
Rupnagar (140001), Punjab, India.
Email :- [email protected]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Axel Kohlmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Vishal Gupta
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I've been running an SCF calculation for a fee Ni system on High
> performance
> > cluster. The job runs fine with processors 7 or less but it always leads
> to
> > segmentation fault if the no of processors exceeds 7.
> > The job takes 4-5 days for the run.
> > Is there any way to increase the no of processors so that it doesn't
> lead to
> > the error ?
> > mpirun noticed that process rank 0 with PID 6353 on node c7c exited on
> > signal 11 (Segmentation fault).
> > or excessive memory leakage.
>
> that is really a question your should ask the system manager(s) or
> user support people of the machine that you are running on.
>
> axel.
>
>
> >
> > Thank You
> > Vishal Gupta
> > B.Tech. 3rd year Mechanical
> > Indian Institute of Technology Ropar
> > Rupnagar (140001), Punjab, India.
> > Email :- [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer  [email protected]  http://goo.gl/1wk0
> College of Science & Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA
> International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. Italy.
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to