I would say that not enough information is included in your message. What do you mean with “running many of them”? Maybe including several pp.x executions in a single submission file for a queuing system? In the case, it might be that the problem is not with pp.x but with the system where you are running it, or else that you are using too many cpus for the execution that requires just one (for example several weeks ago it was reported a similar problem running average.x on many cpus, that was simply solved by running it on just one cpu).
Giovanni > On 25 Oct 2015, at 01:59, Henry J Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Users, > > I've been using pp.x to obtain ILDOS/PDOS/PSI^2 information, and I'm a > little surprised by how long it takes for the processing to finish. I've > used a variety of the pp.x features, and although each pp.x takes only a > couple minutes to finish, when running many of them to obtain specialty > information I find myself waiting days. > The processing gets stuck between the outputs: > > " negative rho (up, down): 1.581E-03 0.000E+00" > > and > > " negative rho (up, down): 1.581E-03 0.000E+00". > > I'm sorry if this isn't enough information to solve this issue, but I'm > hoping this is a simple fix for something I'm overlooking. > > Thank you for your help, > Hank Seeley > PhD student, chemistry > University of Oregon > _______________________________________________ > Pw_forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum > _______________________________________________ Pw_forum mailing list [email protected] http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
