Dear Bahadır,

the input file seems to be OK. Nevertheless, you always have to test in the end
that no charge is spilling into the vacuum because the sawtooth function is
creating an artificial potential minimum. Do this by plotting to total potential (pp.x, plot_num=1) for example as 3D data file and using average.x to average over the in-plane directions. If charge is spilling the potential is not linear in the
vacuum region or shows other weird behavior. In this case you have to reduce
the vacuum region in order to reduce the depth of the artificial minimum. This on the other hand can lead (for too large electric fields) to a vacuum region which is too small, i.e., leading to interactions between the repeated slabs.

The wrong gap you get can be due to anything - your initial input file was just
wrong. The sawtooth within the slab itself is an unphysical situation.

Regards

Thomas


P.S.: You're using an ultrasoft pseudopotential. In such cases ecutrho needs to be larger than just 4 times ecutwfc. More like 10 times... Which is also stated in
the documentation...

On 11/20/2015 03:27 PM, Bahadır salmankurt wrote:
Dear Dr. Thomas Brumme,

Thank you for clear explanation.

And also I have changed my input file. now, Is everything ok?

****
&control
    calculation='scf'
    restart_mode='from_scratch',
    prefix='As',
    tstress = .true.
    tprnfor = .true.
    pseudo_dir ='/home/hakan/tubitak/espresso-5.2.0/pseudo/',
outdir='/home/hakan/tubitak/As/efield/out/',
!           etot_conv_thr = 1.0E-4,
!           forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-3,
     wf_collect=.true.,
!     verbosity='high',
tefield=.true.
*dipfield=.true.*
 /
&system
nbnd=10,
    ibrav=0,celldm(1)=1.8897,
    nat= 2, ntyp=1,
    ecutwfc =30.0,
    ecutrho=120,
*  emaxpos=0.95,*
  eopreg=0.10,
  edir = 3,
eamp = 0.0105,
   /
...

****

By the way, the difference is that , when E field was applied under 5.00 V/nm ( eamp = 0.0097 au) E fieldin prb paper which I shared , the band gap became about 0.80 eV. But I find this band gap under 10.5 V/nm (eamp=0.0205 au) E field ( I have used new input data).

what does the reason such a difference happen?

Thank you again..

--
Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Brumme
Max Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter
Luruper Chaussee 149
22761 Hamburg

Tel:  +49 (0)40 8998 6557

email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to