I went through all the "exx_*.f90" routines and it seems the problem was not
what I mentioned in my last post. However, whatever the cause of the error
is, it is in these routines (I do not know the exact reason). Maybe there is
some small programming error which is ignored by newer versions of
compilers?!
-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenzo Paulatto <[email protected]>
To: PWSCF Forum <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:23:30 +0100
Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] Problem with QE-5.2.1 in building exx routines
On 8 Feb 2016 11:41 a.m., "Mahmoud Payami Shabestari" <[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]> wrote:
>
> Ciao Paolo,
> Thank you very much for your reply.
> As it is mentioned in the UG-5.3.0, "Also, compilers that do not support
intrinsic calls flush, get_environment_variable,get_command_argument,
command_argument_count are no longer supported since v.5.2.1.", the old
compiler complains about "internal error" which most probably is due to the
above-mentioned calls present in "exx_X.f90" routines in the CP package.
This is very unlikely, there are no calls to those intrinsic functions in
EXX, and even if there were, they wouldn't cause an internal compiler error.
Upgrade your compiler or ask your system administrator if you cannot.
For others there is no problem.
> Thank you again,
> mahmoud
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mahmoud, it depends upon the kind of problem. If it is an "internal
compiler error", there is little that can be done. What does the old
compiler complain about exactly? Paolo
>> Dear QE users and developers,
>>
>> Kindly, I encountered with some problems in compiling the CP package
using Intel ifort-11.1.080. The problem is referred to some line in
exx_psi.f90.
>> However, using a newer version of Intel Compiler such as Compxe-2013, the
compilation proceeds without any problem.
>> Is there any simple solution other than moving to new versions of
compilers?
>> Any suggestions is highly appreciated.
>>
>> Mahmoud Payami
>> Theoretical and Computational Physics Group
>> AEOI, Tehran, Iran
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
[http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
[http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum]
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
