Dear Cameron,

I expect this simulation to allow the _atomic positions_ to relax leaving the actual lattice constant unchanged. I also expect the atomic positions to relax in all 3 directions (hence the 1 1 1 after each coordinate specification) but I have seen the x and y coordinates remain relatively unchanged. Again I am really after the Se-Se distance.

Why would you expect in-plane relaxation of atoms? You're calculating 1x1 surface cell, so any Se in-plane movement wouldn't change anything, next set of neighbour Se atoms would still be arrange respectively with presented lattice constant. Of course, in-plane position of Mo atom could change with the respect to Se however, it would distorted the MoSe2 structure. Normally from the top view you see hexagonal structure for TMDC materials and a change of in-plane relative positions of Mo and Se would affect this symmetry.

I don't recall MoSe2 reconstructions, but maybe literature say other ways. If so you should just repeat relaxation if right supercell.

My questions are: is this relaxation calculation doing what I expect it to do? And is the equilibrium structure guaranteed if convergence is achieved? The motivation for the second question is that, I have run a relaxation calculation with this input file, it converges, but then I find negative frequencies in the phonon dispersion particularly with the ZA and TA modes (the ZA mode being the characteristic quadratic mode found in 2D monolayers such as graphene and would be most susceptible to variations in the Se-Se distance). As the simulation experienced no interruptions I suspect the negative frequencies to be a result of numerical issues with the atomic positions and/or the MP grid size (note I used an 8 8 1 grid size for the phonon calculation, not 6 6 4 as mentioned above)

If you think that atomic positions could be the source of your problems, than maybe should try different functionals (PBE should provide different distances).

Regards,
Maciej

Maciej Szary,
PhD student,
Computational Physics and Semiconductors Division,
Poznan University of Technology,
Poland
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
[email protected]
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to